MCFADYEN et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al

Filing 309

REPLY, filed by Plaintiff BRECK ARCHER, to Response to #305 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #300 Response in Opposition to Motion, #294 MOTION for Protective Order for the Deposition of Plaintiffs' Litigation Counsel filed by BRECK ARCHER. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order) (SPARKS, STEFANIE)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA RYAN MCFADYEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DUKE UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:07-cv-953-JAB-JEP PROPOSED ORDER Upon review of the motion and for good cause shown, the Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall file their Reply Brief on the date of the entrance of this Order. So ORDERED, this ___ day of October, 2012. ____________________________ Hon. Joi Elizabeth Peake United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?