MCFADYEN et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al

Filing 310

MOTION to Strike #309 Reply to Response to Motion, and to Declare Briefing Closed on Motion for Protective Order for the Deposition of Plaintiffs' Litigation Counsel [DE 294] by DUKE UNIVERSITY. Responses due by 11/16/2012 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(SUN, PAUL)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 1:07-CV-00953 RYAN McFADYEN, et al., [PROPOSED] ORDER Plaintiffs, v. DUKE UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants. The matter came before the undersigned on the Motion by Duke University (“Duke”), for an order striking Plaintiffs’ reply brief [DE 309] regarding Plaintiffs’ Motion for Extension of Time to File a Reply Brief [DE 305] and declaring briefing closed as of 18 October 2012 on the Motion for Protective Order for the Deposition of Plaintiffs’ Litigation Counsel [DE 294]. Finding the Motion well taken, and for good cause shown, the Court HEREBY GRANTS Duke’s Motion. THEREFORE, it is ORDERED that that the reply brief [DE 309] filed on 19 October 2012 is stricken, and that briefing closed on the Motion for Protective Order for the Deposition of Plaintiffs’ Litigation Counsel [DE 294] on 18 October 2012. It having been ORDERED that briefing is now closed on the Motion for Protective Order for the Deposition of Plaintiffs’ Litigation Counsel [DE 294], the Clerk is directed to refer that Motion to the undersigned for a decision on the merits. This ____th day of _______, 2012 ________________________________ 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?