MCFADYEN et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al
Filing
310
MOTION to Strike #309 Reply to Response to Motion, and to Declare Briefing Closed on Motion for Protective Order for the Deposition of Plaintiffs' Litigation Counsel [DE 294] by DUKE UNIVERSITY. Responses due by 11/16/2012 (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(SUN, PAUL)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 1:07-CV-00953
RYAN McFADYEN, et al.,
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Plaintiffs,
v.
DUKE UNIVERSITY, et al.,
Defendants.
The matter came before the undersigned on the Motion by Duke University
(“Duke”), for an order striking Plaintiffs’ reply brief [DE 309] regarding Plaintiffs’
Motion for Extension of Time to File a Reply Brief [DE 305] and declaring
briefing closed as of 18 October 2012 on the Motion for Protective Order for the
Deposition of Plaintiffs’ Litigation Counsel [DE 294]. Finding the Motion well
taken, and for good cause shown, the Court HEREBY GRANTS Duke’s Motion.
THEREFORE, it is ORDERED that that the reply brief [DE 309] filed on 19
October 2012 is stricken, and that briefing closed on the Motion for Protective
Order for the Deposition of Plaintiffs’ Litigation Counsel [DE 294] on 18 October
2012.
It having been ORDERED that briefing is now closed on the Motion for
Protective Order for the Deposition of Plaintiffs’ Litigation Counsel [DE 294], the
Clerk is directed to refer that Motion to the undersigned for a decision on the
merits.
This ____th day of _______, 2012
________________________________
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?