MCFADYEN et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al
Filing
362
MOTION to Expedite Briefing on Defendants' Motion to Strike by DUKE UNIVERSITY, DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, TARA LEVICY, R.N., GARY N. SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(SUN, PAUL)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CIVIL ACTION NUMBER 1:07-CV-00953
RYAN McFADYEN, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
DUKE UNIVERSITY, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
[PROPOSED] ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on the motion of Defendants Tara Levicy
(“Nurse Levicy”), Gary Smith (“Officer Smith”), Duke University (“Duke”), and
Duke University Health System, Inc. (“DUHS”), (collectively, “Defendants”) to
expedite briefing on Defendants’ Joint Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Untimely and
Unauthorized “Corrected” Response Brief. [DE 362].
For good cause shown, Defendants’ motion to expedite briefing is granted
and the briefing shall proceed as follows:
1.
Plaintiffs shall file any response brief to Defendants’ motion to strike
by 11:59 p.m. on 31 March 2014.
2.
Defendants shall file any reply brief in further support of the motion to
strike by 11:59 p.m. on 3 April 2014.
3.
Should the Court ultimately deny the motion to strike and grant
Defendants’ alternative motion for leave to file a supplemental reply brief in
support of the motion for judgment on the pleadings, Defendants shall file any such
reply brief within three days of the entry of an order denying the motion to strike
and granting the alternative motion for leave.
It is therefore ordered, this the ___ day of March 2014.
___________________________
The Honorable James A. Beaty, Jr.
District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?