MCFADYEN et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al

Filing 69

Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #38 Order on Joint Motion, Rule 12 Briefing Schedule by PATRICK BAKER, STEVEN CHALMERS, RONALD HODGE, LEE RUSS, STEPHEN MIHAICH, BEVERLY COUNCIL, JEFF LAMB, MICHAEL RIPBERGER, LAIRD EVANS. Responses due by 10/6/2008. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(KERNER, PATRICIA)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA RYAN MCFADYEN, et al ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No. 1:07-CV-953 ) DUKE UNIVERSITY, et al ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________________________________________________ ORDER ________________________________________________________________________ Upon consideration of the Consent Motion to Extend Time to Reply filed by Defendants Baker, Chalmers, Russ, Mihaich, Council, Lamb, Ripberger, Hodge, and Evans, for the good cause shown, and based on their agreement with Plaintiffs that all of Plaintiffs' Responses to any Motion to Dismiss will be filed with the Court by Monday, October 6, 2008, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. 2. The Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Reply is GRANTED; and Any Replies by Defendants Baker, Chalmers, Hodge, Evans, Lamb, Mihiach, Ripberger, and Russ are due to be filed with the Court on or before November 26, 2008. So ORDERED on this ________ day of October, 2008. _________________________________ United States District Court Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?