CARRINGTON et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al

Filing 28

MOTION to Continue by KYLE DOWD, PATRICIA DOWD, DANIEL FLANNERY, RICHARD GIBBS FOGARTY, ZACHARY GREER, IRENE GREER, ERIK S. HENKELMAN, STEVEN W. HENKELMAN, JOHN E. JENNISON, BEN KOESTERER, EDWARD CARRINGTON, MARK KOESTERER, JOYCE KOESTERER, FRED KROM, PETER J. LAMADE, ADAM LANGLEY, CHRISTOPHER LOFTUS, DANIEL LOFTUS, BARBARA LOFTUS, ANTHONY MCDEVITT, GLENN NICK, CASEY J. CARROLL, NICHOLAS O'HARA, LYNNDA O'HARA, DANIEL OPPEDISANO, SAM PAYTON, JOHN BRADLEY ROSS, KENNETH SAUER, III, STEVE SCHOEFFEL, ROBERT SCHROEDER, DEVON SHERWOOD, DANIEL THEODORIDIS, MICHAEL P. CATALINO, BRET THOMPSON, CHRISTOPHER TKAC, TRACY TKAC, JOHN WALSH, JR, MICHAEL WARD, ROBERT H. WELLINGTON, IV, WILLIAM WOLCOTT, MICHAEL YOUNG, GALE CATALINO, THOMAS V. CLUTE, KEVIN COLEMAN, JOSHUA R. COVELESKI, EDWARD J. CROTTY, EDWARD S. DOUGLAS. Responses due by 3/31/2008 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) (COOPER, CHARLES)

Download PDF
CARRINGTON et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al Doc. 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 1:08-cv-119 EDWARD CARRINGTON, CASEY J. CARROLL, MICHAEL P. CATALINO, GALE CATALINO, THOMAS V. CLUTE, KEVIN COLEMAN, JOSHUA R. COVELESKI, EDWARD J. CROTTY, EDWARD S. DOUGLAS, KYLE DOWD, PATRICIA DOWD, DANIEL FLANNERY, RICHARD GIBBS FOGARTY, ZACHARY GREER, IRENE GREER, ERIK S. HENKELMAN, STEVEN W. HENKELMAN, JOHN E. JENNISON, BEN KOESTERER, MARK KOESTERER, JOYCE KOESTERER, FRED KROM, PETER J. LAMADE, ADAM LANGLEY, CHRISTOPHER LOFTUS, DANIEL LOFTUS, BARBARA LOFTUS, ANTHONY MCDEVITT, GLENN NICK, NICHOLAS O'HARA, LYNNDA O'HARA, DANIEL OPPENDISANO, SAM PAYTON, JOHN BRADLEY ROSS, KENNETH SAUER, III, STEVE SCHOEFFEL, ROBERT SCHROEDER, DEVON SHERWOOD, DANIEL THEODORIDUS, BRET THOMPSON, CHRISTOPHER TKAC, TRACY TKAC, JOHN WALSH, JR., MICHAEL WARD, ROBERT H. WELLINGTON, IV, WILLIAM WOLCOTT, and MICHAEL YOUNG, Plaintiffs, v. DUKE UNIVERSITY, DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., RICHARD BRODHEAD, PETER LANGE, LARRY MONETA, JOHN BURNESS, TALLMAN TRASK, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Motion for Continuance Dockets.Justia.com SUZANNE WASIOLEK, MATTHEW DRUMMOND, AARON GRAVES, ROBERT DEAN, TARA LEVICY, THERESA ARICO, J. WESLEY COVINGTON, KATE HENDRICKS, VICTOR DZAU, CITY OF DURHAM, LINWOOD WILSON, MARK GOTTLIEB BENJAMIN HIMAN, PATRICK BAKER, STEVEN CHALMERS, RONALD HODGE, LEE RUSS, STEPHEN MIHAICH, BEVERLY COUNCIL, JEFF LAMB, MICHAEL RIPBERGER, and DAVID ADDISON, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) In accordance with Local Rule 6.1(b), counsel for Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court reschedule the hearing on the Duke Defendants' pending Motion Regarding Attorney-Initiated and Attorney-Sanctioned Contact with the Media (Doc. No. 12), which is currently set for March 20, 2008. In support of this motion, Plaintiffs state as follows. 1. Lead counsel for the Plaintiffs in this action, Charles J. Cooper, is also lead counsel in a case, John B. v. Goetz, No. 98-0168, originating in the Middle District of Tennessee that is now on appeal to the Sixth Circuit. Oral argument in the Sixth Circuit is scheduled for March 20, 2008, the same day as the scheduled hearing on the Duke Defendants' Motion in this case. Mr. Cooper had already made arrangements to be in Cincinnati on March 20, 2008 to assist in the Sixth Circuit argument. 2. In addition to the Sixth Circuit argument scheduled for March 20, 2008, Mr. Cooper is also lead counsel in the case of Ambase v. United States, No. 93-531, which is currently in trial in the United States Court of Federal Claims. That trial is currently scheduled to conclude on March 21, 2008. 3. Given that Mr. Cooper's actions are being called into question by the Duke Defendants' Motion, and that Mr. Cooper is the lead counsel in this matter, it is important that he be able to attend the hearing. Moving the hearing to a convenient date after March 21, 2008 would permit Mr. Cooper to do so. 4. The Duke Defendants have authorized the undersigned to represent that they do not object to this motion. The Plaintiffs therefore respectfully request that the hearing be rescheduled to Monday, March 24, 2008, or as soon thereafter as meets with the convenience of the Court. March 6, 2008 Respectfully submitted, COOPER & KIRK, PLLC By: _/s/ Nicole Jo Moss___________ ____ Charles J. Cooper* David H. Thompson* Nicole Jo Moss (N.C. Bar # 31958) 1523 New Hampshire Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036 Tel. (202) 220-9600 Email ccooper@cooperkirk.com Email nmoss@cooperkirk.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs (* motion for special appearance has been filed) -andTHOMAS, FERGUSON & MULLINS, L.L.P. By: _/s/ William J. Thomas___________ ___ William J. Thomas, II (N.C. Bar # 9004) 119 East Main Street Durham, NC 27701 Tel. (919) 682-5648 Email thomas@tfmattorneys.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on March 6, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing Motion for a Continuance with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following counsel: Counsel for Defendants Duke University, Richard H. Brodhead, Peter Lange, Larry Moneta, John Burness, Tallman Trask, Suzanne Wasiolek, Matthew Drummond, Aaron Graves, Robert Dean, Kate Hendricks and Victor Dzau J. Donald Cowan, Jr. (N.C. Bar # 0968) Dixie T. Wells (N.C. Bar # 26816) L. Cooper Harrell (N.C. Bar # 27875) Smith Moore LLP 300 N. Greene Street Suite 1400 Greensboro, N.C. 27401 Don.cowan@smithmoorelaw.com Dixie.wells@smithmoorelaw.com Cooper.harrell@smithmoorelaw.com Counsel for Defendants Duke University Health Systems, Inc. Tara Levicy and Theresa Arico Dan J. McLamb (N.C. Bar # 6272) Yates, McLamb & Weyher, L.L.P. One Bank of America Plaza 421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1200 Raleigh, North Carolina 27601 dmclam@ymwlaw.com Counsel for Duke University William F. Lee Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP 60 State Street Boston, Massachusetts 02109 William.lee@wilmerhale.com Jamie Gorelick Paul. R. Q. Wolfson Jennifer O'Connor Wilmer Culter Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP 1875 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 Jamie.gorelick@wilmerhale.com paul.wolfson@wilmerhale.com Jennifer.oconnor@wilmerhale.com Counsel for David W. Addison James B. Maxwell Maxwell, Freeman & Bowman, P.A. P.O. Box 52396 Durham, NC 27717 Phone: (919) 493-6464 jmaxwell@mfbpa.com Counsel for City of Durham Reginald B. Gillespie, Jr. Faison & Gillespie P.O. Box 5517 Durham, NC 27717 rgillespie@faison-gillespie.com Counsel for Benjamin W. Himan Joel Miller Craig 4011 University Drive, Suite 300 Durham, North Carolina 27717-1579 jcraig@kennoncraver.com As of the date of this filing, no attorney has made an appearance on behalf of the following Defendants. Based on information and belief, the following Defendants are represented by counsel as indicated below and are being served by email: Counsel for Beverly Council, Ronald Hodge, Jeff Lamb, Stephen Mihaich, Michael Ripberger, Lee Russ, and Patrick Baker Patricia P. Kerner Troutman Sanders, LLP P.O. Drawer 1389 Raleigh, NC 27602-1389 tricia.kerner@troutmansanders.com Counsel for Mark D. Gottlieb Edwin M. Speas, Jr., Esq. (N.C. Bar # 4112) P.O. Box 10096 Raleigh, North Carolina 27605-0096 espeas@poynerspruill.com Counsel for Steven Chalmers Reginald B. Gillespie, Jr. Faison & Gillespie P.O. Box 5517 Durham, NC 27717 rgillespie@faison-gillespie.com As of the date of this filing, no attorney has made an appearance on behalf of any of the following Defendants. I hereby certify that I served the following Defendants by U.S. Mail: Linwood Wilson 6910 Innesbrook Way Bahama, NC 27503-9700 J. Wesley Covington Bryant, Patterson, Covington, Lewis, & Lindsley, P.A. 103 W. Main Street Durham, NC 27702 This 6th day of March 2008. /s/ Nicole Jo Moss___________ Nicole Jo Moss (N.C. Bar # 31958) 1523 New Hampshire Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036 Tel. (202) 220-9600 nmoss@cooperkirk.com ____

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?