STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC. v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, et al
Filing
66
Suggestion of Subsequently Decided Authority re 56 Reply to Response to Motion, 50 Response in Opposition to Motion, 39 MOTION to Intervene , 40 Memorandum, by Plaintiff STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Opinion)(RULEY, DANIEL)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CASE NO. 1:14-CV-954
STUDENTS FOR FAIR
ADMISSIONS, INC.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH
CAROLINA, et al.,
Defendants.
PLAINTIFF’S SUGGESTION OF
SUBSEQUENTLY DECIDED AUTHORITY
Pursuant to L.R. 7.3(i), M.D.N.C., Plaintiff Students for Fair Admissions, Inc.
(“SFFA”) respectfully files this suggestion of subsequently decided authority in support of
its opposition to the proposed intervenor-defendants’ motion to intervene, see Dkt. Nos.
39, 40, 50, 56. The case is Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of
Harvard Coll., --- F.3d ---, 2015 WL 8285559 (1st Cir. Dec. 9, 2015), a copy of which is
attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Respectfully submitted this 29th day of December, 2015.
/s/ Alan M. Ruley
Alan M. Ruley
N.C. State Bar No. 16407
Bell, Davis & Pitt, P.A.
Post Office Box 21029
Winston-Salem, NC 27120-1029
Telephone:
336/722-3700
Facsimile:
336/722-8153
Email:
aruley@belldavispitt.com
1
Thomas R. McCarthy
William S. Consovoy
J. Michael Connolly
Consovoy McCarthy Park PLLC
3033 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 700
Arlington, VA 22201
Telephone:
703/243-9423
Facsimile:
703/243-9423
tom@consovoymccarthy.com
will@consovoymccarthy.com
mike@consovoymccarthy.com
Counsel for Plaintiff Students for
Fair Admissions, Inc.
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on December 29, 2015, I filed a true and correct copy of the
foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification
of such filing to all parties through the Court’s CM/ECF system.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Alan M. Ruley
Alan M. Ruley
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?