STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC. v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, et al

Filing 66

Suggestion of Subsequently Decided Authority re 56 Reply to Response to Motion, 50 Response in Opposition to Motion, 39 MOTION to Intervene , 40 Memorandum, by Plaintiff STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Opinion)(RULEY, DANIEL)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CASE NO. 1:14-CV-954 STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA, et al., Defendants. PLAINTIFF’S SUGGESTION OF SUBSEQUENTLY DECIDED AUTHORITY Pursuant to L.R. 7.3(i), M.D.N.C., Plaintiff Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. (“SFFA”) respectfully files this suggestion of subsequently decided authority in support of its opposition to the proposed intervenor-defendants’ motion to intervene, see Dkt. Nos. 39, 40, 50, 56. The case is Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard Coll., --- F.3d ---, 2015 WL 8285559 (1st Cir. Dec. 9, 2015), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Respectfully submitted this 29th day of December, 2015. /s/ Alan M. Ruley Alan M. Ruley N.C. State Bar No. 16407 Bell, Davis & Pitt, P.A. Post Office Box 21029 Winston-Salem, NC 27120-1029 Telephone: 336/722-3700 Facsimile: 336/722-8153 Email: aruley@belldavispitt.com 1 Thomas R. McCarthy William S. Consovoy J. Michael Connolly Consovoy McCarthy Park PLLC 3033 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 700 Arlington, VA 22201 Telephone: 703/243-9423 Facsimile: 703/243-9423 tom@consovoymccarthy.com will@consovoymccarthy.com mike@consovoymccarthy.com Counsel for Plaintiff Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on December 29, 2015, I filed a true and correct copy of the foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to all parties through the Court’s CM/ECF system. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Alan M. Ruley Alan M. Ruley 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?