Reed et al v. Freebird Film Productions, Inc. et al

Filing 3

Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Hallmark Entertainment Dist., LLC, Artisan Entertainment, Inc., Lynyrd Skynyrd Productions,Inc., Freebird Film Productions, Inc., Fly On, Inc., Cabin Fever Entertainment, Inc., Vector Management, Inc., Judy Van Zant Jenness, Gary Rossington & Ross Schilling. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (C,BA)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of Ohio Craig Reed et al Plaintiff v. Freebird Film Productions, Inc. efealdant D et n CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ORDER OF REFERENCE Case Number: 1:08cv1761 CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73, the parties in this case hereby voluntarily consent to have a United States magistrate judge conduct any and all further proceedings in the case, including the trial, and order the entry of a final judgment. Signatures Party Represented Date ORDER OF REFERENCE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be referred to Magistrate White United States Magistrate Judge, for all further proceedings and the entry of judgment in accordance with 28 U.S. C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 and the foregoing consent of the parties. Date United States District Judge NOTE: RETURN THIS FORM TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT ONLY IF ALL PARTIES HAVE CONSENTED ON THIS FORM TO THE EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of Ohio NOTICE & ORDER Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(c)(1) and LR 73.1, a Magistrate Judge of the Northern District of Ohio may, upon consent of all parties to an action, and entry of an order of reference by the Judge, exercise trial jurisdiction in civil actions, both jury and non-jury, and enter final judgment therein. If all parties to this action consent and an order of reference is entered, the case will be assigned to a Magistrate Judge pursuant to LR 73.1. If all parties do not consent, or if an order of reference is not entered, the action will remain with the Judge to whom it is assigned. The decision of counsel on this matter of consent is entirely voluntary. Your response is joint, and disclosure of individual decisions is not required. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 73.1, Recusal, Resignation or Death of Magistrate Judge, where the parties have consented of the transfer of a civil case to a Magistrate Judge under section (a) above, if the Magistrate Judge thereafter recuses, resigns or dies, the case shall be returned to the District Court Judge. The Clerk shall immediately assign another Magistrate Judge by the random draw and notify the parties of such new assignment. Within ten (10) days after such notification by the Clerk, the parties shall indicate their consent, or lack thereof, to transferring the case to the newly-assigned Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. §636(c). If the parties do not consent to the transfer, the case shall remain with the District Court Judge. At the time the last appearance of counsel is made on behalf of the named defendant, the parties are to communicate with each other on this matter. It is the responsibility of plaintiff's counsel to initiate such consultation. The response is to be returned within ten (10) days of the last appearance. The response must contain the signatures of all counsel. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(c)(3) all appeals relating to magistrate consent cases must be heard only in the court of appeals. Please return the completed response form to the Office of Clerk of the Court as promptly as possible. If an order of reference is entered by the Court, you will be advised by the Clerk as to which Magistrate Judge the case has been assigned for further proceedings. Geri M. Smith, Clerk of Court (See form on the reverse side) o:\forms\consent.pdf revised January 2002 Proposed Consents should be filed electronically using the civil event "Notice".

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?