United States of America v. Lawson

Filing 61

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 53 Report and Recommendations. The Court ORDERS that the plaintiff be required to stay execution and enforcement of this judgment, while Dr. Lawson continues her work as a psychiatrist at the Hawaii s ite, and, pursuant to Section 12 of the Consent judgment, upon Dr. Lawsons completion of two years of service at the Hawaii site, plaintiff be required to file with the Court a satisfaction of judgment.Accordingly, Dr. Lawsons motion to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii (Doc. 40) is DENIED.. Signed by Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott on 6/23/11. (wam1) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/23/2011: # 1 Certified Mail Receipt) (wam1).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION

United States of America,
Plaintiff(s),
vs.
Marva Lawson,
Defendant(s).

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

Case Number: 1:03cv698
Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott

ORDER
This matter is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United
States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States
Magistrate Judge Timothy S. Black. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed
the pleadings and filed with this Court on April 15, 2010 a Report and Recommendation (Doc.
53). Subsequently, the plaintiff filed objections to such Report and Recommendation (Doc. 56)
and defendant filed a response (Doc. 60).
The Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and
considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the
Court does determine that such Recommendation should be adopted.
The Court ORDERS that the plaintiff be required to stay execution and enforcement of
this judgment, while Dr. Lawson continues her work as a psychiatrist at the Hawaii site, and,
pursuant to Section 12 of the Consent judgment, upon Dr. Lawson’s completion of two years of
service at the Hawaii site, plaintiff be required to file with the Court a satisfaction of judgment.

Accordingly, Dr. Lawson’s motion to transfer this case to the United States District Court

for the District of Hawaii (Doc. 40) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
___s/Susan J. Dlott___________
Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott
United States District Court