Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Claus et al

Filing 24

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Accordingly, plaintiffs motion for default judgment (Doc. 13) is GRANTED as to Defendants Deborah A. Durstock and Russell J. Claus, Jr. Plaintiffs motion for leave to make deposit and for dismissal with pr ejudice (Doc. 14) is GRANTED. The Clerk is ORDERED to accept and deposit into the Registry of the Court $17, 247.60, plus any applicable interest (Remaining Plan Benefits). The Clerk is ORDERED to promptly and properly invest said monies as pr ovided by S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 77.2. Each of the Defendants are enjoined and restrained from instituting any action against Plaintiff, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, General Electric Company, the Plan, and/or their affiliates or successors for th e recovery of the Remaining Plan Benefits. Upon the deposit of the Remaining Plan Benefits Plaintiff, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company is dismissed with prejudice as a party to this action, and Plaintiff, General Electric Company, and the Plan ar e released from any and all claims or liability for the Remaining Plan Benefits payable under the Plan as a result of the death of the Decedent Russell J. Claus. Defendants Barbara A. Claus, Russell S. Ruehl, Randolph B. Ruehl and Kandice N. Smith must file cross motions for judgment within 30 days of the entry date of this order or forfeit their claims to the Remaining Plan Benefits. (wam1, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/30/2009: # 1 Certified Mail Receipt) (jweb1, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff(s), vs. BARBARA CLAUS, et. al., Defendant(s). : : : : : : : : : Case Number: 1:07cv1017 Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott ORDER The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy S. Black filed on September 16, 2008 (Doc. 15), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired October 6, 2008, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. According to the docket sheet, there are two docket entries listed as objections to the Report and Recommendation (Docs. 22 and 23). Upon review of the Court, the documents that were filed as objections are not. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Doc. 13) is GRANTED as to Defendants Deborah A. Durstock and Russell J. Claus, Jr. Plaintiff's motion for leave to make deposit and for dismissal with prejudice (Doc. 14) is GRANTED. The Clerk is ORDERED to accept and deposit into the Registry of the Court $17, 247.60, plus any applicable interest ("Remaining Plan Benefits"). The Clerk is ORDERED to promptly and properly invest said monies as provided by S.D. Ohio Civ. R. 77.2. Each of the Defendants are enjoined and restrained from instituting any action against Plaintiff, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, General Electric Company, the Plan, and/or their affiliates or successors for the recovery of the Remaining Plan Benefits. Upon the deposit of the Remaining Plan Benefits Plaintiff, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company is dismissed with prejudice as a party to this action, and Plaintiff, General Electric Company, and the Plan are released from any and all claims or liability for the Remaining Plan Benefits payable under the Plan as a result of the death of the Decedent Russell J. Claus. Defendants Barbara A. Claus, Russell S. Ruehl, Randolph B. Ruehl and Kandice N. Smith must file cross motions for judgment within 30 days of the entry date of this order or forfeit their claims to the Remaining Plan Benefits. IT IS SO ORDERED. _ ___s/Susan J. Dlott___________ Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?