Bey v. UN60/147

Filing 7

ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 5 . Case is Dismissed with Prejudice and Terminated on the docket of this Court. Signed by Judge Herman J. Weber on 6/21/11. (Attachments: # 1 cert.recpt) (do1)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION WILLIAM TYRONE ROSS BEY, Plaintiff v. C-1-11-282 UN60/147, Defendant ORDER This matter is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 5) to which neither party has objected. Upon a de novo review of the record, the Court finds that the Judge has accurately set forth the applicable law and has properly applied it to the particular facts of this case. Accordingly, in the absence of any objection by plaintiff, this Court accepts the Report as uncontroverted. -2The Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (doc. no. 5) is hereby ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. Plaintiff’s Complaint (doc. no. 4)is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) that for the foregoing reasons an appeal of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation would not be taken in good faith and therefore DENIES plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis. Plaintiff remains free to apply to proceed in forma pauperis in the Court of Appeals. See Callihan v. Schneider, 178 F.3d 800, 803 (6th Cir. 1999), overruling in part Floyd v. United States Postal Serv., 105 F.3d 274, 277 (6th Cir. 1997). This case is DISMISSED AND TERMINATED on the docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Herman J. Weber Herman J. Weber, Senior Judge United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?