Estes v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 34

ORDER ADOPTING 32 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Accordingly, the ALJ's non-disability determination is not supported by substantial evidence in the record presented. Therefore, plaintiff's 25 Motion for contempt, 26 Request for audio-v isual record, and 19 Request for addendum are DENIED. Plaintiff's 31 Motion to expedite is GRANTED. Defendant's decision is found NOT TO BE SUPPORTED BY SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, REVERSED and REMANDED for additional review under Sentence Four. This case is hereby TERMINATED. Signed by Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott on 6/18/12. (mtw) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/18/2012: # 1 Certified Mail Receipt) (mtw).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Timothy J. Estes, Plaintiff(s), vs. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant(s). : : : : : : : : : Case Number: 1:11cv496 Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott ORDER The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Stephanie K. Bowman filed on May 25, 2012 (Doc. 32), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) expired June 11, 2012, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the ALJ’s non-disability determination is not supported by substantial evidence in the record presented. Therefore, plaintiff’s motion for contempt, request for audio-visual record, and request for addendum (Docs. 19, 25 and 26) are DENIED. Plaintiff’s motion to expedite (Doc. 31) is GRANTED. Defendant’s decision is found NOT TO BE SUPPORTED BY SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE, REVERSED and REMANDED for additional review under Sentence Four. This case is hereby TERMINATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___s/Susan J. Dlott___________ Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott United States District Court

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?