Parks v. Holcomb et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 5 Motion to Mandate :The Court hereby DISMISSES thecomplaint for want of prosecution.It is FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs "Motion To Mandate" (Doc. 5) is DENIEDas moot. Signed by Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott on 9/3/2014. (jlw1) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/3/2014: # 1 Certified Mail Receipt) (jlw1).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Case No. 1:14-cv-318
PROSECUTOR HOLCOMB, et al.,
On July 31,2014, this Court adopted the Magistrate Judge's May 16, 2014 Report and
Recommendation to deny plaintiff leave to proceed informa pauperis and ordered plaintiff "to
pay the full $400.00 fee ($350 filing fee plus $50 administrative fee) required to commence this
action within 30 days." (Doc. 8; see also Doc. 6). Plaintiff was "notified that his failure to pay
the full $400 fee within 30 days will result in the dismissal of this action." (Doc. 8). Cf. In re
Alea, 286 F.3d 378, 382 (6th Cir. 2002). Plaintiff has not paid the fee required to commence this
action, and the deadline for doing so has passed. Therefore, the Court hereby DISMISSES the
complaint for want of prosecution.
It is FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs "Motion To Mandate" (Doc. 5) is DENIED
The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that for the foregoing reasons an
appeal of this Court's Order would not be taken in good faith. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth,
114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Susan J. Dlott, Chidf Judge
United States DistricFCourt
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?