Clark v. The Walt Disney Company et al

Filing 13

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time New date requested 1/30/2009. To Respond to Defendants Jakks Pacific., Play Along Toys, and Toys 'R Us' Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff Aaron Clark. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A) (Dickerson, Brian)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AARON CLARK, : : Plaintiff, : v. : : THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, et : al., : : Defendants. : : : Case No. 2:08CV982 Judge Holschuh Magistrate Judge Abel PLAINTIFF AARON CLARK'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS JAKKS PACIFIC, INC., PLAY ALONG TOYS, AND TOYS `R US' MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiff Aaron Clark ("Plaintiff"), by and through his attorneys, hereby motions this Honorable Court for an additional seven (7) days to respond to Defendants JAKKS Pacific, Inc., Play Along Toys, and Toys ,,R Us ("Defendants") Motion to Dismiss, which was filed on January 2, 2009 (Doc 11). Pursuant to Local Rule 7.2(a)(2), Plaintiffs Memorandum in Opposition is due to be filed on January 23, 2009. If this Motion is granted, Plaintiffs Opposition would be due on January 30, 2009. Plaintiff has consulted with Defendants counsel, Grant Kinsel, who does not oppose Plaintiffs request. Dated: January 8, 2009 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Brian E. Dickerson_________________ Brian E. Dickerson (0069227) Sharlene I. Chance (0070999) Kevin R. Conners (0042012) THE DICKERSON LAW GROUP, P.A. 5003 Horizons Drive, Suite 101 Columbus, OH 43220 Telephone: (614) 339-5370 Facsimile: (614) 442-5942 bdickerson@dickerson-law.com schance@dickerson-law.com kconners@dickerson-law.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Aaron Clark CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on January 8, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system upon counsels of record. /s/ Sharlene I. Chance__________________ Sharlene I. Chance (0069227) Attorney for Plaintiff Aaron Clark 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?