Hinds v. Bishop et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 6 of Magistrate Judge Bernard M. Jones...this case is transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma for all further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 2/1/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment 1 - Report and Recommendation)(cla) [Transferred from Oklahoma Western on 2/2/2017.]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
C.O. BISHOP, et al.,
Plaintiff Anthony Hinds, a state prisoner appearing pro se, brought this action
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging violations of his federal constitutional rights while
imprisoned at the Northeast Oklahoma Correctional Facility. The matter was referred to
U.S. Magistrate Judge Bernard M. Jones for initial proceedings consistent with 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Jones has recommended that the suit be transferred to the United
States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma, as venue is proper in that court.
The parties were advised of their right to file an objection to the Report and
Recommendation by January 26, 2017. No objections have been filed. The parties have
therefore waived any right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues raised in the
Report and Recommendation. United States v. One Parcel of Real Property, 73 F.3d 1057,
1059–60 (10th Cir. 1996); see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The court therefore ADOPTS
the Report and Recommendation [Doc. #6], a copy of which is attached to this order. This
case is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 1st day of February, 2017.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?