Flores v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 21

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 20 of Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin the decision of the Commissioner is Reversed and this case is Remanded for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Report. Signed by Honorable Joe Heaton on 08/10/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment Report and Recommendation 20 )(lam)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA ROSA FLORES, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NO. CIV-16-0997-HE ORDER Plaintiff Rosa Flores has appealed the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, which denied her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under the Social Security Act. This case was referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge Shon T. Erwin for initial proceedings consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) concluded the Commissioner’s decision was based on a mischaracterization or misreading of the opinion of plaintiff’s treating physician. The Report recommends the decision be reversed and this case be remanded for further administrative proceedings. Objections to the Report were due by June 27, 2017, and no objection has been filed. Having failed to object to the Report, the parties have waived their right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues it addressed. United States v. One Parcel of Real Property, 73 F.3d 1057, 1059–60 (10th Cir. 1996); see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Accordingly, the court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. #20], a copy of which is attached to this order. The decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and this case is REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Report. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 10th day of August, 2017. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?