QVC, INC. v. SCHIEFFELIN et al
Filing
26
Attachment 1
REPLY to Response to Motion re
21 MOTION for Leave to File
Second Amended Complaint Reply Memorandum of Plaintiff QVC, Inc. in Further Support of Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint filed by QVC, INC., CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (Attachments: #
1 Exhibit A#
2 Certificate of Service)(METZ, NATHANIEL) Modified on 4/13/2007 (afm, ).
QVC, INC. v. SCHIEFFELIN et al
Doc. 26 Att. 1
Case 2:06-cv-04231-TON
Document 26-2
Filed 04/12/2007
Page 1 of 3
EXHIBIT "A"
987180.1 4/12/07
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:06-cv-04231-TON
Document 26-2
Filed 04/12/2007
Page 2 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ____________________________________ : : CIVIL ACTION QVC, INC. : : Plaintiff, : v. : NO. 06-cv-4231(TON) : : STACEY SCHIEFFELIN, : DAVID SCHIEFFELIN, and MODELS PREFER, LTD., : : Defendants. : ____________________________________:
DECLARATION OF NATHANIEL METZ, ESQUIRE I, Nathaniel Metz, Esquire, declare pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1746: 1. I am an attorney admitted, among other places, to the Bar of the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania and the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (the "Court"). 2. I am a partner with the law firm of Saul Ewing LLP in its offices located at 1200
Liberty Ridge Drive, Suite 200, Wayne, PA 19087. On September 25, 2006, my office was located at Centre Square West, 1500 Market Street, 38th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19103. 3. I am counsel to QVC, Inc. ("Plaintiff"), plaintiff in the civil action pending in the
Court as QVC, Inc. v. Stacey Schieffelin, et al., C.A. No. . 06-cv-4231(TON) (the "Civil Action"). 4. Plaintiff commenced the Civil Action on September 22, 2006. Following
commencement of the litigation, and based upon express statements made to Plaintiff by the defendants in the Civil Action that they intended to proceed in contravention of the restrictive
987180.1 4/12/07
Case 2:06-cv-04231-TON
Document 26-2
Filed 04/12/2007
Page 3 of 3
covenant and non-competition provision of the agreement at issue in the Civil Action, I had papers prepared under my direction that were intended to seek preliminary injunctive relief under Fed.R.Civ.P. 65 to maintain the status quo during the pendency of the litigation. 5. On September 25, 2006, I sent the letter appended as Exhibit "B" to Defendants'
Memorandum Of Law In Opposition To Motion Of Plaintiff QVC, Inc. To File Second Amended Complaint filed in the Civil Action. I sent such letter to counsel for the defendants in the Civil Action in an effort to reach agreement to maintain the status quo and avoid the need to seek injunctive relief from the Court. 6. An agreement subsequently was reached between the parties that obviated the
need for Plaintiff to seek preliminary injunctive relief. Based upon the representation of the defendants' counsel that Plaintiff would be given ten days notice of any action to be taken in contravention of the restrictive covenant and non-competition provision of the subject agreement, Plaintiff refrained from filing its request for preliminary injunctive relief unless and until such notice was given by Defendants.. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
NATHANIEL METZ Executed on April 12, 2007
987180.1 4/12/07
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?