HUTTO v. PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY et al
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. IT IS GRANTED AS TO THE 354 CASES IN CATEGORY I AND AS TO THE 65 CASES IN CATEGORY II LISTED IN EXHIBIT "B", ATTACHED. IT IS DENIED AS TO THE 25 CASES IN CATEGORY III, LISTED IN EXHIBIT "C, ATTACHED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 12/10/09. (Attachments: # 1 Order) 12/11/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(lisad, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA VARIOUS PLAINTIFFS v. VARIOUS DEFENDANTS ("Oil Field Cases") : : : : : : : : ORDER AND NOW, this 10th day of December 2009, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion to remand (doc. no. 45) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is GRANTED as to the 354 CONSOLIDATED UNDER MDL 875 CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-MC-103
cases in Category I and as to the 65 cases in Category II listed in Exhibit "B", attached. It is DENIED as to the 25 cases in
Category III, listed in Exhibit "C", attached.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
S/ Eduardo C. Robreno EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?