EASTERLING et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC.
Filing
24
RESPONSE in Opposition re 21 MOTION to Stay Proceedings filed by CHARLES RAY EASTERLING. (Attachments: # 1 Memo of Law, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Text of Proposed Order)(COBEN, LARRY)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CHARLES RAY EASTERLING and his
wife, MARY ANN EASTERLING;
WAYNE RADLOFF and his wife,
GARLAND RADLOFF; JAMES
McMAHON; JOSEPH E. THOMAS and his
wife, NICOLE THOMAS; GERALD
FEEHERY; STEVE KINER and his wife
CAROL KINER, and MICHAEL FURREY
and his wife, KOREN FURREY, in their
individual capacity and on behalf of all
others similarly situated.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-CV-05209-AB
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
PLAINTIFFS,
V.
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC.
DEFENDANT.
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN OPPOSITION TO THE
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR A STAY OF PROCEEDINGS
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT, upon the Memorandum of Law in Support of
Plaintiffs’ Motion in Opposition to the National Football League’s Motion for a Stay of
Proceedings, and all other papers and proceedings herein, the Plaintiffs respectfully moves this
Court to Deny Defendant’s Motion for a Stay of Proceedings.
/
/
/
/
/
Dated: November 18, 2011
Respectfully submitted,
ANAPOL SCHWARTZ, P.C.
By:
/s/ Larry Coben
Larry E. Coben, Esquire
Attorney I.D. No. 17523
Sol H. Weiss, Esquire
Attorney I.D. No. 15925
1710 Spruce Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103
(215) 735-2098
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Larry Coben, hereby certify that on November 18, 2011, that Plaintiffs’ foregoing
Motion in Opposition to the National Football League’s Motion for a Stay of Proceedings, the
Memorandum of Law in support of thereof, and the exhibits thereto have been filed
electronically and are available for downloading and viewing from the Court’s ECF System by
all counsel of record.
Dated: November 18, 2011
By:
3
/s/ Larry Coben
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?