EASTERLING et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC.

Filing 24

RESPONSE in Opposition re 21 MOTION to Stay Proceedings filed by CHARLES RAY EASTERLING. (Attachments: # 1 Memo of Law, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Text of Proposed Order)(COBEN, LARRY)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CHARLES RAY EASTERLING and his wife, MARY ANN EASTERLING; WAYNE RADLOFF and his wife, GARLAND RADLOFF; JAMES McMAHON; JOSEPH E. THOMAS and his wife, NICOLE THOMAS; GERALD FEEHERY; STEVE KINER and his wife CAROL KINER, and MICHAEL FURREY and his wife, KOREN FURREY, in their individual capacity and on behalf of all others similarly situated. CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-CV-05209-AB JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PLAINTIFFS, V. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC. DEFENDANT. PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION IN OPPOSITION TO THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR A STAY OF PROCEEDINGS PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT, upon the Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion in Opposition to the National Football League’s Motion for a Stay of Proceedings, and all other papers and proceedings herein, the Plaintiffs respectfully moves this Court to Deny Defendant’s Motion for a Stay of Proceedings. / / / / / Dated: November 18, 2011 Respectfully submitted, ANAPOL SCHWARTZ, P.C. By: /s/ Larry Coben Larry E. Coben, Esquire Attorney I.D. No. 17523 Sol H. Weiss, Esquire Attorney I.D. No. 15925 1710 Spruce Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 (215) 735-2098 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Larry Coben, hereby certify that on November 18, 2011, that Plaintiffs’ foregoing Motion in Opposition to the National Football League’s Motion for a Stay of Proceedings, the Memorandum of Law in support of thereof, and the exhibits thereto have been filed electronically and are available for downloading and viewing from the Court’s ECF System by all counsel of record. Dated: November 18, 2011 By: 3 /s/ Larry Coben

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?