EASTERLING et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC.

Filing 32

RESPONSE in Opposition re 30 Memorandum in Support of Request to (Conduct Pretrial Discovery)Memorandum in Support of Request to (Conduct Pretrial Discovery) filed by NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, INC.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit 1 (Plaintiffs' Amended Deposition Notice), # 3 Exhibit 2 (Maxwell v. Nat'l Football League (C.D. Cal. No. 11-CV-08394), Dec. 8, 2011 Order))(KARP, BRAD)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CHARLES RAY EASTERLING and his
wife, MARY ANN EASTERLING, et al.,

CIVIL ACTION
Case No. 11-CV-05209-AB

Plaintiffs,
v.
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE,
INC.,
Defendant.

ORDER
AND NOW, on this ______ day of ________________, 2012, having considered
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Conduct Pretrial Discovery (Doc. No. 30) and Defendant National
Football League’s Memorandum of Law in opposition thereto, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED and DECREED that Plaintiffs’ Motion is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs are barred from taking the requested
discovery until the National Football League’s pending Motion to Dismiss is decided.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:

___________________________________
The Honorable Anita B. Brody
United States District Judge