MCDANIEL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT NO LATER THAN 2/24/2017, COUNSEL SHALL PROVIDE THE COURT WITH THEIR AVAILABILITY FOR TRIAL IN MAY AND JUNE 2017. IN THE ALTERNATIVE, THE PARTIES MAY WISH TO CONSIDER WHETHER TO CONSENT TO PROCEED TO TRIAL BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, IN WHICH CASE COUNSEL SHOULD COMPLETE AND SUBMIT THE ATTACHED FORM TO THE CLERK OF COURT.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 2/13/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) 2/14/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2803
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA,
AND NOW, this 13th day of February 2017, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion
for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 16) and Plaintiffs’ response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED
that the motion is DENIED for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum
It is further ORDERED that no later than February 24, 2017, counsel shall provide the
Court with their availability for trial in May and June 2017. In the alternative, the parties may
wish to consider whether to consent to proceed to trial before a United States Magistrate Judge,
in which case counsel should complete and submit the attached form to the Clerk of Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Cynthia M. Rufe
CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?