SCHLOTTER v. VAN DER EIJK et al
Filing
1
COMPLAINT against ERB INTERNATIONAL, INC., GRAHAM VAN DER EIJK ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 049841.), filed by KRISTEN SCHLOTTER. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(mima, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYL VANIA
KRSTEN SCHLOTTER:
3 Valley Circle
Doylestown, PA 18901
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No
GRAHAM V AN DER EIJK:
1662 Erbs Road, UN 1 ST
Agatha ON NOB2LO:
and
ERB INTERNATIONAL, INC.
290 Hamilton Road:
New Hamburg ON N3A1A2
Defendants.
PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANTS
Plaintiff
Kristen Schlotter, submits this Complaint against Defendants, Graham Van Der
Eijk and Erb International, Inc., stating:
PARTIES
1. Plaintiff is domiciled in and a citizen of the State of Pennsylvania, residing at 3
Valley Circle, Doylestown, Bucks County, Pennsylvania 18901.
2. Defendant Graham VanDer Eijk ("VanDer Eijk") is domiciled in and a citizen
of
Canada, residing at 1662 Erbs Road, UN1 ST, Agatha, ON NOB2LO.
3. Defendant Erb International, Inc. is incorporated under the laws of Canada and
has its a principal place of
business at 290 Hamilton Road, New Hamburg, ON N3A1A2.
Defendant Erb International, Inc is a citizen of Canada.
2681950vl
4. Defendant Erb International, Inc. is a long distance trucking company regularly
conducting business in Pennsylvania.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
5. Jurisdiction exists by virtue of diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
Plaintiff is a citizen of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Defendants are citizens of
6. The amount in controversy exceeds seventy-five thousand dollars
($75,000.00), exclusive of
interest and costs.
judicial district under 28 D.S.C. §1391(a) and (b), as it
7. Venue is proper in this
is the judicial district in which a substantial par of the events or omissions giving rise to the
claim occurred.
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
8. On or about October 20,2009, at about 6:18 p.m., Plaintiff
Kristen Schlotter
was the restrained driver of a Mitsubishi Eclipse, which was stopped behind several other cars
in traffic in a designated construction zone on SR 222 in West Earl Township, Lancaster
County, Pennsylvania. At that time, Plaintiffs car was suddenly and without warning struck
from the rear by a tractor-trailer that was being operated by Defendant VanDer Eijk.
9. Defendant VanDer Eijk's negligent, careless or reckless acts or omissions
were the sole cause of the accident. The collsion was not due in any maner to any act or
failure to act on the par of plaintiff.
-22681950vl
10. The violent impact of
Kristen
Defendant Van Der Eijk truck with the rear of
Schlotter's car caused a chain reaction of collsions with the cars that were stopped in front of
her car.
11. On the date of the accident, the tractor trailer that was driven by Defendant
VanDer Eijk was owned by Defendant Erb International, Inc.
12. Defendant Erb International, Inc. employed Defendant Van Der Eijk as its
employee, agent and servant, and the authorized operator of its tractor trailer.
13. At the time of the accident, Defendant VanDer Eijk was acting within the
his agency and employment with Defendant Erb International, Inc.
scope of
14. Defendant Erb International, Inc. is liable for the acts of
Eijk by way of
Defendant Van Der
vicarious liability and/or respondeat superior.
15. When the Defendants' truck collded with the Plaintiffs car, the car was
shoved into the car in front of
hers. Ms. Schlotter was jolted back and forth and experienced
"double whiplash" injuries. The accident caused permanent injuries to her head, neck, back
and spine, right shoulder, left shoulder, and left knee, as well as other injuries.
16. Diagnostic tests revealed that Ms. Schlotter suffered, inter alia, a broken neck
vertebrae C2. Medical
in the accident. Specifically, she sustained non-displaced fractures of
providers also diagnosed that as a result of the accident, Ms. Schlotter suffered post
concussion syndrome, depressive disorder and post traumatic stress disorder.
-32681950vl
17. Kristen Schlotter sustained permanent injuries and both immediate and long-
term pain and suffering in the accident. Her injuries include, but are not limited to: C2
fractures, cervical pain, paraspinal tenderness, thoracic pain, bilateral shoulder pain, clavicle
pain, left knee pain, muscle spasms, headaches, dizziness, black-outs, tinnitus,
photosensitivity, sonophobia, memory loss, decreased cognitive fuction, anxiety, depression,
sleep difficulties.
18. At the time of
the accident, Ms. Schlotter had
just begun her freshman year at
the injuries she sustained in the accident, she had to
Milersvile University. As a result of
withdraw from college.
19. As a result of the accident, Kristen Schlotter suffered financial
losses,
including school-related losses, loss of income and loss of earing capacity.
20. As a result of
the accident, Kristen Schlotter has incured medical expenses and
wil continue to incur future medical expenses.
21. As a result of the accident, Kristen Schlotter has and wil continue to sustain
mental anguish and a loss oflife's enjoyment.
COUNT I - NEGLIGENCE PLAINTIFF KRSTEN SCHLOTTER V. DEFENDANT GRAHAM VAN DER EIJK
22. Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference paragraphs 1 through 21 of this
Complaint.
23. Defendant Van Der Eijk owed Kristen Schlotter a duty of care with respect to
the operation of his motor vehicle.
-42681950vl
24. The collsion and Kristen Schlotter's injuries and damages are directly and
proximately caused by the negligence, carelessness and/or recklessness of
Defendant Van Der
Eijk in that he:
(a) Operated his truck in a reckless, careless and negligent maner and at an
improper, excessive rate of speed under the circumstances;
(b) Operated his truck at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under
the conditions and having regard to the actual and potential hazards then existing;
(c) Operated his truck at a speed greater than wil permit the driver to bring
his vehicle to a stop within the assured clear distance ahead;
(d) Failed to operate his truck at a safe and appropriate speed when
approaching a designated construction zone;
(e) Failed to take adequate evasive maneuvers required to avoid an accident;
(f) Failed to have his truck under proper and adequate control at the time of
the accident;
(g) Failed to bring his truck to a complete stop;
(h) Failed to maintain a reasonable lookout for the presence of other motor
vehicles on the road;
(i) Operated his truck without due regard for the rights, safety and position of
Plaintiff
Kristen Schlotter in violation of statute, including, but not limited to, 75 Pa. C.S. §3714;
-5-
2681950vl
G) Failed to exercise due and proper care;
(k) Failed to observe traffc and traffic conditions; and,
(1) Otherwise operated his truck negligently as consequences and discovery
may disclose directly and proximately causing the aforesaid collsion and Plaintiff s damages.
Defendant Van Der Eijk's negligence,
25. As a direct and proximate result of
Kristen Schlotter has sustained numerous injuries and losses, some or all of which are
permanent.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment in her favor and against Defendants
in an amount in excess of Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars ($75,000.00), plus costs and interest.
COUNT II - NEGLIGENCE PLAINTIFF KRSTEN SCHLOTTER V. DEFENDANT ERB INTERNATIONAL. INC.
26. Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference paragraphs 1 through 28 of this
Complaint.
27. Erb International, Inc. negligently and carelessly entrusted Defendant Van Der
Eijk with operation of the tractor-trailer involved in the accident with plaintiff, which was a
proximate cause of the losses and damages plaintiff has sustained.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment in her favor and against Defendants in an
amount in excess of Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars ($75,000.00), plus costs and interest.
-62681950vl
COUNT III - VICARIOUS LIABILITY PLAINTIFF KRSTEN SCHLOTTER V. DEFENDANT ERB INTERNATIONAL. INC.
28. Plaintiff incorporates herein by reference paragraphs 1 through 30 ofthis
Complaint.
29. Because Defendant Van Der Eijk was the agent, servant, workman and/or
employee of Erb International, Inc. at the time of the afore-described accident, and was acting
within the scope of his duties for Erb International, Inc., Erb International, Inc. is vicariously
liable for the damages and losses Defendant Van Der Eijk's negligence and carelessness
proximately caused to Plaintiff.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment in her favor and against Defendants
in an amount in excess of Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars ($75,000.00), plus costs and interest.
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Plaintiff demands a trial by jury.
MONTGOMERY, MCCRACKEN, WALKER & RHOADS, LLP
Dated: September 16, 201 1
-72681950v 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?