Reisinger v. City of Wilkes Barre et al
Filing
65
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Defendants' Responses in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration by Joseph R. Reisinger. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Certificate of Nonconcurrence and Certificate of Service, # 3 Exhibit(s) A, # 4 Exhibit(s) B, # 5 Exhibit(s) C, # 6 Exhibit(s) D)(Reisinger, Joseph)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : v. : : THE CITY OF WILKES BARRE; : THOMAS LEIGHTON; : FRANCES KRATZ; : GREGORY BARROUK; : MICHAEL KERMEC and : THE CADLE COMPANY II, INC. : Defendants : JOSEPH R. REISINGER, Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION LAW JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
(Judge Conaboy)
No. 3:09-CV-210
ORDER NOW, this ____ day of September, 2010 upon consideration of the Plaintiff's Motion to Have Ten (10) Days to File a Response to Defendants' Responses in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration, it is ORDERED and DECREED that the above Motion is hereby granted.
BY THE COURT: ________________________ J.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
