MORT et al v. LAWRENCE COUNTY CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES et al
Filing
14
ORDER scheduling Initial Case Management Conference for 2/24/11 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 7A before Judge David S. Cercone. Rule 26 conference to be held on or before 1/27/11. Stipulation Selecting ADR Process and Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 2/10/11. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 12/16/10. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Stipulation Selecting ADR Process; and # 2 Exhibit B - Rule 26 Report Form) (njt)
MORT et al v. LAWRENCE COUNTY CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES et al
Doc. 14
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ELIZABETH MORT and ALEX RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiffs, vs. LAWRENCE COUNTY CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES; LAWRENCE COUNTY; CHRISSY MONTAGUE, Lawrence County Children and Youth Services Caseworker; and JAMESON HEALTH SYSTEM, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
2:10cv1438 Electronic Filing
ORDER OF COURT AND NOW, this 16th day of December, 2010, counsel for all parties having been identified on the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. Initial Case Management Conference. Pursuant to Local Rule 16.1, an
Initial Case Management Conference shall be held before the undersigned on Thursday, February 24, 2011, at 11:00 a.m., Courtroom No. 7A, Seventh Floor, United States Post Office & Courthouse, Pittsburgh, PA. At the conference, the parties will discuss narrowing of the issues, the extent of pretrial preparation, discovery procedures, the early disposition of controlling questions of law, the probable extent of provable damages, the possibility of settlement, the designation of an Alternative Dispute Resolution process, and any other matter that will contribute to the prompt disposition of the case. Trial counsel and all unrepresented parties shall be present at the conference. If trial counsel is unable to attend, the Court will require the presence of substitute counsel who is fully informed as to the status of the case and who is authorized to make binding agreements on behalf of the client and trial counsel. 2. Rule 26(f) Conference. Pursuant to Rule 26(f), and not withstanding the
pendency of any outstanding motion, the parties MUST confer to consider the nature and basis of
Dockets.Justia.com
their claims and defenses and the possibilities for a prompt settlement or resolution of the case and to make arrangements for the disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1) on or before January 27, 2011. Plaintiff shall initiate this conference; however, the Court will hold all parties responsible for ensuring that this conference is held in a timely manner. 3. Rule 26(f) Report. The parties MUST confer as necessary and MUST file
with the Court the Stipulation Selecting ADR Process (attached hereto as Exhibit A) and the Rule 26(f) Report (attached hereto as Exhibit B) on or before February 10, 2011. The parties may decide who will prepare and file the Stipulation and Rule 26(f) Report; however, the Court will hold all parties responsible for ensuring that the Stipulation and Report are filed in the correct form and in a timely manner. This Court requires strict compliance with Rule 26. THE PARTIES ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY IDENTIFIED NEUTRAL (COURT APPROVED OR PRIVATE) IS REQUIRED TO BECOME A REGISTERED USER OF THE ELECTRONIC CASE FILING SYSTEM IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. COUNSEL SHALL SO NOTIFY THEIR AGREED UPON NEUTRAL AND REFER THEM TO THE COURT'S WEBSITE AT WWW.PAWD.USCOURTS.GOV FOR USER REGISTRATION FORMS. COUNSEL SHALL CONFIRM TO THE COURT AT THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE THAT THE SELECTED NEUTRAL HAS COMPLETED THIS PROCESS.
s/ David Stewart Cercone David Stewart Cercone United States District Judge cc: Antoinette C. Oliver, Esquire Patricia L. Dodge, Esquire Quinn A. Johnson, Esquire Sara Rose, Esquire Marie Milie Jones, Esquire John C. Conti, Esquire Richard J. Kabbert, Esquire (Via CM/ECF Electronic Mail)
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?