JENKO v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.

Filing 6

ORDER scheduling Initial Case Management Conference for 4/24/13 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 7A before Judge David S. Cercone. Rule 26 conference to be held on or before 4/9/13. Stipulation Selecting ADR Process and Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 4/16/13. Signed by Judge David S. Cercone on 3/13/13. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Stipulation Selecting ADR Process; and # 2 Exhibit B - Rule 26 Report Form) (njt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Plaintiff(s), v. Defendant(s). ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. STIPULATION SELECTING ADR PROCESS Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to L.R. 16.2 and the Court’s ADR Policies and Procedures. I. PROCESS Select one of the following processes: ______ Mediation Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) ______ Court sponsored Binding 1 Arbitration ______ Court sponsored Non-binding Arbitration ______ Private ADR (please identify process and provider) Other (please identify process and provider)_____________________________ ________________________________________________________________ *If you are utilizing a private process, be advised that the case is still governed by the Court’s ADR Policies and Procedures. It is the responsibility of counsel to ensure that all of the proper forms are timely submitted and filed, as required by Policies and Procedures. II. COSTS The parties have agreed to share the ADR costs as follows (do not complete percentages for Court sponsored arbitration. For that process, costs are paid by the Court in accordance with 28 USC §658.): % by Plaintiff(s) % by Defendant(s) If a dispute arises as to compensation and costs for the mediator/neutral evaluator/private arbitrator, the Court will set reasonable compensation and costs. 1 For binding arbitration, please complete form “Stipulation to Binding Arbitration” located on the Court’s website at www.pawd.uscourts.gov III. NEUTRAL The parties hereby designate by agreement the following individual to serve as a Neutral in the above-styled action: Name of Neutral: Address of Neutral: Telephone & FAX Numbers: Email address of Neutral: Date of ADR Session: _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ _ _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ The parties represent that they have contacted the selected prospective neutral and have determined that the neutral is available to conduct the ADR session within the time prescribed by the Court's Policies and Procedures and that the neutral does not have a conflict. IV. PARTICIPANTS Name and title of the individual(s) who will be attending the mediation or early neutral evaluation session, in addition to counsel, in accordance with Section 2.7 (Attendance at Session) of the Court’s ADR Policies and Procedures: For Plaintiff(s) ____________________ For Defendant(s) __________________ For 3rd party Deft(s) ________________ __________________________________________ Name and title __________________________________________ Name and title __________________________________________ Name and title If there is insufficient space to list all parties who will be attending the session, please add additional sheets as necessary. Each party certifies that the representative(s) attending the ADR session on its behalf has full and complete settlement authority, as specified in sub-section (A)(1-3) of the above section of the Court’s ADR Policies and Procedures. V. ACKNOWLEDGMENT We, the undersigned parties to this action, declare that this stipulation is both consensual and mutual. Dated: ______________________________________ Attorney for Plaintiff(s) Dated: ______________________________________ Attorney for Defendant(s) Rev. 2/2012

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?