Roger Cleveland Golf Company Inc v. Prince et al
Filing
135
Supplemental MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law ( Response to Motion due by 5/9/2011), Supplemental MOTION for New Trial, Supplemental MOTION for Relief from Judgment by Bright Builders Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Memo in Support, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit, # 7 Exhibit, # 8 Exhibit, # 9 Exhibit, # 10 Exhibit, # 11 Exhibit, # 12 Exhibit, # 13 Exhibit, # 14 Exhibit, # 15 Exhibit, # 16 Exhibit, # 17 Exhibit, # 18 Exhibit)No proposed order(Doolittle, Paul)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
CHARLESTON DIVISION
Roger Cleveland Golf Company, Inc.,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Christopher Prince, Sheldon Shelley, Prince
Distribution, LLC, and Bright Builders,
Inc.
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil Action No. 2:09-2119-MBS
DEFENDANT BRIGHT BUILDERS,
INC.’S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION
FOR RENEWED MOTION FOR
JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW
(FED. R. CIV. P. 50(b); MOTION FOR
A NEW TRIAL (FED. R. CIV. P. 59);
MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM
JUDGMENT (FED. R. CIV. P. 60)
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 50, 59 and 60, the Defendant Bright Builders, Inc. moves this
Court for entry of an Order for Granting Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law;
Motion for a New Trial; and Motion for Relief from Judgment. In support of this motion the
Defendant Bright Builders provides to the Court’s the facts and legal argument provided in its
Supplemental Memorandum in Support of its Supplemental Motion for Renewed Motion for
Judgment as a Matter of Law; Motion for a New Trial; and Motion for Relief from Judgment.
WHEREFORE, the Defendant Bright Builders moves the Court for entry of an Order
granting the above in the present action.
Respectfully submitted,
s/Paul J. Doolittle
Paul J. Doolittle, Esquire
Federal Bar No.: 6012
Jekel-Doolittle, LLC
Post Office Box 2579
Mt. Pleasant, SC 29465
(843) 654-7700
Fax: 888-567-1129
paul@j-dlaw.com
Dated: April 22, 2011
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?