Roger Cleveland Golf Company Inc v. Prince et al

Filing 135

Supplemental MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law ( Response to Motion due by 5/9/2011), Supplemental MOTION for New Trial, Supplemental MOTION for Relief from Judgment by Bright Builders Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Memo in Support, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit, # 7 Exhibit, # 8 Exhibit, # 9 Exhibit, # 10 Exhibit, # 11 Exhibit, # 12 Exhibit, # 13 Exhibit, # 14 Exhibit, # 15 Exhibit, # 16 Exhibit, # 17 Exhibit, # 18 Exhibit)No proposed order(Doolittle, Paul)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION Roger Cleveland Golf Company, Inc., Plaintiff, vs. Christopher Prince, Sheldon Shelley, Prince Distribution, LLC, and Bright Builders, Inc. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 2:09-2119-MBS DEFENDANT BRIGHT BUILDERS, INC.’S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION FOR RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW (FED. R. CIV. P. 50(b); MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL (FED. R. CIV. P. 59); MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT (FED. R. CIV. P. 60) Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 50, 59 and 60, the Defendant Bright Builders, Inc. moves this Court for entry of an Order for Granting Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; Motion for a New Trial; and Motion for Relief from Judgment. In support of this motion the Defendant Bright Builders provides to the Court’s the facts and legal argument provided in its Supplemental Memorandum in Support of its Supplemental Motion for Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; Motion for a New Trial; and Motion for Relief from Judgment. WHEREFORE, the Defendant Bright Builders moves the Court for entry of an Order granting the above in the present action. Respectfully submitted, s/Paul J. Doolittle Paul J. Doolittle, Esquire Federal Bar No.: 6012 Jekel-Doolittle, LLC Post Office Box 2579 Mt. Pleasant, SC 29465 (843) 654-7700 Fax: 888-567-1129 paul@j-dlaw.com Dated: April 22, 2011 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?