UHLIG LLC v. Shirley et al

Filing 412

ORDER granting 407 Motion for Permanent Injunction as to Jeremy Richardson. Signed by Honorable Henry F Floyd on 8/6/09. (Attachments: # 1 Consent Permanent Injunction)(alew, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION UHLIG LLC, et al., ) CONSENT PERMANENT INJUNCTION C.A. NO.: 6:08-1208-HFF ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) v. ) ) JOHN ADAM SHIRLEY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) -14831 -0762-0612.1 This matter having come before the Court on Plaintiff, Uhlig LLC's ("Uhlig") and Defendant Jeremy Richardson's ("Richardson") Stipulated Motion For Entry Of Consent Permanent Injunction ("Consent Injunction"). The Court, finding good cause existing therefor; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED a permanent injunction is issued in favor of Uhlig and against Richardson as follows: Richardson shall not, directly or indirectly, either individually or as a principal, partner, employee, independent contractor, consultant, stockholder, member, joint venturer, or investor, engage in, assist or have any active interest in a business located anywhere in the United States that is in the business of selling, printing, providing, marketing or producing newsletters, periodicals, calendars, printed marketing materials, custom publishing services, or printed communications materials for the senior or multi-family housing industries, the childcare industry, the retail industry, or other multi-site businesses (the "Restricted Business") for a period of three (3) years from the date hereof; provided, however, that Richardson will be entitled to be employed by or otherwise participate in a Restricted Business if Uhlig gives its express written consent thereto, which consent Uhlig will not unreasonably withhold, after Richardson affords Uhlig thirty (30) days advance written notice of his desire to participate in the Restricted Business in question. Richardson further shall not, for a period of three (3) years from the date hereof, directly or indirectly, either individually or as a principal, partner, employee, independent contractor, consultant, stockholder, member, joint venturer, or investor, engage in, assist or have any active interest in a Restricted Business in which Defendant John Adam Shirley, Holman, Dorsey, or Clark is involved in any way. Richardson shall not disclose or utilize in any way information belonging to Uhlig, including but not limited to information relating to Cox CustomMedia, Inc.'s ("CCM") or Uhlig's customer lists, customer information, revenues, financial projections, costs, margins, production processes, customer-specific needs, pricing, pricing methodologies or formulas, financial statements, business affairs, financial status or condition, operations, assets, liabilities, plans, strategies, initiatives, contracts, existing and ongoing transactions, business arrangements, transactions or proposals under consideration, technology and systems, personnel, proprietary know-how, data, documents, designs, photographs, plans, graphs, drawings or other proprietary information that is otherwise not generally known to the public. For a period of three (3) years from the date hereof, Richardson shall not solicit, for the purpose of selling, printing, providing, marketing, developing, or producing newsletters, periodicals, calendars, printed marketing materials, custom publishing services, or printed communications materials, any customer who has done business with Uhlig or CCM within a three (3) year period prior to the date hereof. For the same period, Richardson also shall not aid or help any other business, entity, or person in soliciting or attempting to solicit, for the purpose of selling, printing, providing, marketing, developing, or producing newsletters, periodicals, calendars, printed marketing materials, custom publishing services, or printed communications materials to any customer who has done business with Uhlig or CCM within a three (3) year period prior to the date hereof. If Richardson desires to solicit Restricted Business from a person or entity and wants assurance that the person or entity is not a customer who has done business with Uhlig or -24831 -0762-0612.1 CCM within a three (3) year period prior to the date hereof, Richardson shall give Uhlig fifteen (15) days advance written notice of the name of the person or entity and Uhlig will, within fifteen (15) days of receipt of the notice, advise Richardson in writing whether the person or entity is a customer who has done business with Uhlig or CCM within a three (3) year period prior to the date hereof. In any action for breach of this Injunction, the Court shall award attorneys' fees and costs to the prevailing party. As this is a Consent Injunction, no bond is required. As this Injunction concludes all claims against Richardson in this action, the claims against her are concluded without prejudice upon entry of the Injunction with the Court retaining jurisdiction to enforce the Injunction, and with the claims against Richardson to be considered dismissed in their entirety with prejudice upon the expiration of 30 days from the conclusion of the injunctive period referenced herein unless, before that date, Uhlig files a motion alleging a violation of this Injunction or a breach of the settlement agreement reached between them. SO ENTERED on this 6th day of August, 2009. s/Henry F. Floyd UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE /s/Frank H. Gibbes, III Frank H. Gibbes III (#2084) GIBBES BURTON, LLC 308 East Saint John Street Spartanburg, SC 29302 fgibbes@gibbesburton.com Telephone: Facsimile: and Juliet A. Cox Elizabeth D. Nay KUTAK ROCK LLP 1010 Grand Blvd, Suite_500 Kansas City, MO 64111 Telephone: Facsimile: Juliet.Cox@KutakRock.com Elizabeth.Nay@KutakRock.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF UHLIG LLC -34831 -0762-0612.1 (864)_327-5000 (864)_327-500 (816)_960-0090 (816)_960-0041 And /s/John E. Rogers, II John Rogers (#10014) P.O. Box 5663 Spartanburg, South Carolina 29304 ATTORNEY FOR RICHARDSON -44831 -0762-0612.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?