Ferguson et al v. Accounts Receivable Management Inc et al

Filing 36

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that 1 Complaint filed by James Robert Reeves, Joshua Lee Ferguson be dismissed without prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 10/3/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce Howe Hendricks on 9/16/08. (Attachments: # 1 Objection Notice)(jtho, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION Joshua Lee Ferguson, James Robert Reeves, Plaintiffs, vs. Accounts Receivable Management, Inc.; JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, Defendants. ) Civil Action No.: 6:08-1598-HFF-BHH ) ) ) ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ) OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE ) ) ) ) ) The plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, filed this action on April 15, 2008. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), service of the summons and complaint must be made within 120 days of the date the complaint is filed (in this case, August 18, 2008. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m)). There is no indication that the plaintiffs have ever served Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA, who has not appeared in this case. By order of this Court filed July 7, 2008, the plaintiffs were specifically reminded of their obligation to make proof of service. Because the plaintiffs are proceeding pro se, another order was filed August 25, 2008, reminding the plaintiffs of this deadline and giving them until September 14, 2008, to make proof of timely service. The plaintiffs were specifically advised that if they failed to respond, this action would be subject to dismissal. To date, the plaintiffs have failed to provide the Court with evidence that service has been accomplished. Wherefore, it is recommended that this case be dismissed without prejudice. s/Bruce Howe Hendricks United States Magistrate Judge September 16, 2008 Greenville, South Carolina

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?