Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
Filing
160
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #84 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction or in the Alternative, for Failure to State a Claim or for a More Definite Statement (Unopposed) by Datatreasury Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bruster, Anthony)
<![CDATA[
Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
Doc. 160 Att. 1
Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC
Document 160
Filed 06/13/2006
Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DATATREASURY CORPORATION PLAINTIFF v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, et al DEFENDANTS § § § § §
CIVIL ACTION No. 2:06CV72
ORDER
Plaintiff DataTreasury Corporation has filed an Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time, which is now before the Court. The Court hereby GRANTS the Motion for Extension of Time. Therefore, Plaintiff's response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, or in the Alternative, for Failure to State a Claim for a More Definite Statement will be due on or before June 23, 2006. SO ORDERED.
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
