Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company et al

Filing 207

RESPONSE to Motion re #125 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by City National Corporation, City National Bank. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rosenblatt, Elizabeth)

Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company et al

Doc. 207

Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC

Document 207

Filed 06/22/2006

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DATATREASURY CORP. Plaintiff vs. CITY NATIONAL CORPORATION; and CITY NATIONAL BANK, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § No. 2:06CV-165 (DF) (Consolidated with 2:06CV-72 (DF)) (Lead Case) Hon. David J. Folsom JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR CONSOLIDATION AND JOINDER IN DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR CONSOLIDATION IN CASE NO. 2:06-CV-72 DF This Court has ordered, pursuant to an unopposed motion by Defendants City National Corporation and City National Bank (collectively, "CNB Defendants") that the present action be consolidated with the matter of DataTreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Co., et al., No. 5:06cv72 (the "Wells Fargo Litigation") (Order, Dkt No. 20). Thus, to the extent that Plaintiffs' Motion For Consolidation seeks to consolidate those two actions, it is moot. The CNB Defendants oppose the remainder of the motion, which seeks consolidation of the present action with DataTreasury Corporation v. Magtek, Inc., No. 2:03cv459; DataTreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company, et al., No. 2:05cv291; DataTreasury Corporation v. Bank of America Corporation, No. 2:05cv292; DataTreasury Corporation v. Wachovia Corp. et al., No. 2:05cv293, and DataTreasury Corporation v. Citigroup, Inc., et al., 2:50cv294 (the "Ballard Patent Cases"). The CNB Defendants' opposition to the present motion is based on the arguments contained in Defendants' Response To Plaintiff's Motion For Consolidation filed

1524038

-1Dockets.Justia.com

Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC

Document 207

Filed 06/22/2006

Page 2 of 3

concurrently in the Wells Fargo Litigation (Dkt No 199). Rather than repeat those arguments here, Defendants join in that Response, and incorporate it by reference herein. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Elizabeth L. Rosenblatt David I. Gindler (CA #117824, pro hac vice) Lead Counsel Elizabeth L. Rosenblatt (CA #203196, pro hac vice) Andrew D. Weiss (CA #232974, pro hac vice) IRELL & MANELLA LLP 1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900 Los Angeles, CA 90067 [phone] [phone] (facsimile) [e-mail] S. Calvin Capshaw (TX #03895700) Elizabeth L. DeRieux (TX #05770585) BROWN MCCARROLL, L.L.P. 1127 Judson Road, Suite 220 Longview, Texas 75601 [phone] [phone] (facsimile) [e-mail] COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANTS CITY NATIONAL BANK CITY NATIONAL CORPORATION

1524038

-2-

Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC

Document 207

Filed 06/22/2006

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document has been served on June 22, 2006 to all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3).

/s/ Elizabeth L. Rosenblatt Elizabeth L. Rosenblatt

1524038

-3-