Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company et al

Filing 292

MOTION to Sever and Stay Claims Related to Ballard Patents Pending Reexamination by BB&T Corporation, Branch Banking and Trust Company, Comerica Incorporated, Comerica Bank & Trust, National Association, M&T Bank Corporation, M&T Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A#2 Exhibit B#3 Exhibit C#4 Exhibit D#5 Text of Proposed Order Exhibit E)(Williams, E Danielle) Additional attachment(s) added on 10/13/2006 (sm, ).

Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company et al

Doc. 292 Att. 4

Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC

Document 292

Filed 10/11/2006

Page 1 of 3

EXHIBIT D

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC

Document 292

Filed 10/11/2006

Page 2 of 3
-~

UNxT~ STATES PATENT AND TRAD~ibFF]~

)

COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE P.O. 80X 1450 ALEXANDRIA. VA 22313-1450

www.u~to.gO

Ex Parte Reexamination Filing Data

-

September 30, 2005

1.

Total requests filed since start of cx parte reexam on 07/01/8 1 a. By patent owner b. By other member ofpublic c. By order of Commissioner 3221 4357 165

7743 42% 56% 2%

2.

Number of filings by discipline a. Chemical Operation b. Electrical Operation c. Mechanical Operation 2420
2457

2866

31% 32% 37%

3.

Annual Ex Parte Reexam Filings Fiscal Yr. 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 No. 78(3mos.) 187 186 189 230 232 240 268 Fiscal Yr. 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 No. 243 297 307 392 359 379 392 418 Fiscal Yr. 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 No. 376 350 385 318 296 272 392 441 Fiscal Yr. No. 2005 524

4.

Number known to be in litigation

1705

22%

5.

Determinations on requests a. No.granted (1) Byexaniiner (2) By Director (on petition) b. No. denied (1) By examiner
(2) Order vacated

7510 6846 6740 106 664 629
35

91%

9%

1

Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC

Document 292

Filed 10/11/2006

Page 3 of 3

6.

Total examiner denials (includes denials reversed by Director) a. Patent owner requester b. Third party requester

.

735 419 316 57% 43%

7.

Overall reexamination pendency (Filing date to certificate issue date) a. Average pendency b. Median pendency 21.9 (mos. 17.2 (mos.

8. Reexam certificate claim analysis: a. All claims confirmed b. All claims cancelled c. Claims changes

Owner Requester 23% 7% 70%

3rd Party Requester 29% 12% 59%

Comm'r Initiated 13% 19% 68%

Overall 26% 10% 64%

9.

Total cx parte reexamination certificates issued (1981 present)
-

5209 1363 526 3320 26% 10% 64%

a. Certificates with all claims confirmed b. Certificates with all claims canceled c. Certificates with claims changes

10. Reexam claim analysis requester is patent owner or 3rd party; or Comm'r initiated.
-

a. Certificates

-

PATENT OWNER REQUESTER 527 164 1581

2272 23% 7% 70% 2803 819 332 1652 29% 12% 59% 134 17 26 91 13% 19% 68%

1 All claims confirmed 2 All claims canceled 3 Claim changes b. Certificates 3rd PARTY REQUESTER
--

1 All claims confirmed 2 All claims canceled 3 Claim changes c. Certificates COMM'R INITIATED REEXAM 1 2 3 All claims confirmed All claims canceled Claim changes

2