Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company et al

Filing 293

MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages In Response to Motion of Defendants EDS, HARRIS, PNC AND SUNTRUST to Sever and Stay the Claims Relating to the Ballard Patents by Datatreasury Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1#2 Supplement ORDER)(King, Richard)

Download PDF
Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC Document 293 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 1 of 3 Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company et al Doc. 29 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DATATREASURY CORPORATION Plaintiff v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, et al. Defendants § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 2:06-CV-72 Judge David Folsom UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS IN RESPONSE TO MOTION OF DEFENDANTS EDS, HARRIS, KEY, PNC, AND SUNTRUST TO SEVER AND STAY THE C LAIMS RELATING TO THE BALLARD PATENTS PENDING REEXAMINATION OF THE BALLARD PAT ENTS Plaintiff, DataTreasury Corporation ( "DataTreasury"), respectfully requests that the Court grant its Unopposed Motion to Exceed Page Limits in Response to Motion of Defendants EDS, Harris, Key, PNC, and Suntrust ("Defendants") to Sever and Stay the Claims Relating to the Ballard Patents Pending Reexamination of the Ballard Patents. Defendants were the first group of defendants to file such a motion when the instant motion was filed on September 19, 2006. Since that time, various other defendants in this action have filed motions joining Defendants' Motion. DataTreasury intends to file a consolidated response to all motions to sever and stay relating to Defendants' Motion. DataTreasury, respectfully requests that the Court grant its Unopposed Motion to exceed the page limits in its consolid ated response. Respectfully submitted, /s/ R. Benjamin King EDWARD L. VON HOHN , Attorney in Charge State Bar No. 09813240 N IX PATTERSON & ROACH, L.L.P. Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC Document 293 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 2 of 3 205 Linda Drive Daingerfield, Texas 75638 903.645.7333 (telephone) 903.645.4415 (facsimile) edhohn@nixlawfirm.com C. CARY PATTERSON State Bar No. 15587000 BRADY PADDOCK State Bar No. 00791394 A NTHONY BRUSTER State Bar No. 24036280 R. BENJAMIN KING State Bar No. 24048592 N IX PATTERSON & ROACH L.L.P. 2900 St. Michael Drive, Suite 500 Texarkana, Texas 75503 903.223.3999 (telephone) 903.223.8520 (facsimile) akbruster@nixlawfirm.com bpaddock@nixlawfirm.com benking@nixlawfirm.com JOE KENDALL State Bar No. 11260700 KARL R UPP State Bar No. 24035243 PROVOST * U MPHREY, L.L.P. 3232 McKinney Avenue, Ste. 700 Dallas, Texas 75204 214.744.3000 (telephone) 214.744.3015 (facsimile) jkendall@provostumphrey.com krupp@provostumphrey.com R OD COOPER State Bar No. 90001628 EDWARD C HIN S TATE BAR NO. 50511688 N IX PATTERSON & R OACH LLP 5215 N. O'Connor Blvd. Ste. 1900 Irving, Texas 75039 972.831.1188 (telephone) 972.692.5445 (facsimile) rcooper@cooperiplaw.com Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC Document 293 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 3 of 3 edchin@nixlawfirm.com ERIC M. A LBRITTON State Bar ;No. 00790215 A LBRITTON LAW FIRM P.O. Box 2649 Longview, Texas 75606 903.757.8449 (telephone) 903.758.7397 (facsimile) ema@emafirm.com T. JOHN WARD, JR. State Bar No. 00794818 LAW OFFICE OF T. JOHN WARD, JR. P.O. Box 1231 Longview, Texas 75601 903.757.6400 (telephone) 903.757.2323 (facsimile) jw@jwfirm.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF DATATREASURY CORPORATION CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing th document was served on counsel o f record for Defendants on the 11 day of October, 2006. /s/ R. Benjamin King Nix, Patterson & Roach LLP CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE Pursuant to Local Rule 7(h), movant has contacted opposing counsel to discuss this motion and was informed that opposing counsel agrees to the relief requested herein. /s/ R. Benjamin King Nix, Patterson & Roach LLP

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?