Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company et al

Filing 576

MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages (UnionBanCal's Reply to Plaintiff's Amended Response to Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) (Unopposed) by Unionbancal Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's Amended Response#2 Affidavit Affidavit of Gerardy Carrenard (to Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's Amended Response)#3 Exhibit A (to Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's Amended Response)#4 Exhibit B (to Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's Amended Response)#5 Exhibit C (to Defendant's Reply to Plaintiff's Amended Response)#6 Text of Proposed Order)(Ainsworth, Jennifer)

Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company et al

Doc. 576 Att. 6

Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC

Document 576

Filed 03/01/2007

Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DATATREASURY CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Civil Action No. 2-06CV-72

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS On this day the Court considered UnionBanCal's Unopposed Motion to Exceed Page Limitations with regard to its Reply to Plaintiff's Amended Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2). After considering the

Motion, the Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that UnionBanCal may file its Reply to Plaintiff's Amended Response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(2) exceeding the ten page limit for replies to dispositive motions.

Dockets.Justia.com