Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company et al

Filing 97

MOTION to Dismiss , IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT by Electronic Data Systems Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Stevenson, Theodore)

Datatreasury Corporation v. Wells Fargo & Company et al

Doc. 97

Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC

Document 97

Filed 06/01/2006

Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DATATREASURY CORPORATION, Plaintiff v. WELLS FARGO & CO., et al., Defendants DEFENDANT ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS CORP.'S MOTION TO DISMISS, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT Defendant Electronic Data Systems Corp. ("EDS"), hereby moves pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to dismiss Plaintiff DataTreasury Corporation's ("DTC") First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. In the alternative, EDS hereby moves pursuant to Rule 12(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for a more definite statement of DTC's claims. In support of this Motion and in the interest of brevity, EDS relies on and incorporates herein by reference as if set forth verbatim the arguments presented in the Joint Motion of Defendants to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for More Definite Statement1 ("Joint Motion") filed CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06-CV-72 DF

1

The Joint Motion was filed on behalf of Defendants Bank of America Corporation; Bank of America, N.A.; Bank of New York Co., Inc.; Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd.; BB&T Corporation; Branch Banking and Trust Company; Citizens Financial Group, Inc.; Comerica Bank & Trust, N.A.; Comerica, Inc.; Cullen/Frost Bankers, Inc.; Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas; First Data Corporation; LaSalle Bank Corporation; LaSalle Bank, N.A; M&T Bank Corporation.; M&T Bank; Remitco, LLC; TeleCheck Services, Inc.; The Bank of New York; The Frost National Bank; UBS Americas, Inc.; Union Bank of California, N.A.; UnionBanCal Corporation; Wachovia Bank, N.A.; Wachovia Corporation; Wells Fargo & Company; and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Dallas 220221v1

Dockets.Justia.com

Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC

Document 97

Filed 06/01/2006

Page 2 of 3

on June 1, 2006 (Docket No. 80). EDS bases this Motion on the arguments and legal authorities set forth in the Joint Motion, and seeks the same relief requested therein. Dated: June 1, 2006 Respectfully submitted, McKOOL SMITH, P.C.

/s/ Theodore Stevenson, III THEODORE STEVENSON, III Lead Attorney Texas State Bar No. 19196650 [e-mail] GARRET W. CHAMBERS Texas State Bar No. 00792160 [e-mail] L. DAVID ANDERSON Texas State Bar No. 00796126 [e-mail] 300 Crescent Court Suite 1500 Telephone: [phone] Telecopier: [phone] PETER J. AYERS Texas State Bar No. 24009882 [e-mail] 300 W. 6th Street, Suite 1700 Austin, Texas 78701 Telephone: [phone] Telecopy: [phone] ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS CORP.

Dallas 220221v1

2

Case 2:06-cv-00072-DF-CMC

Document 97

Filed 06/01/2006

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this motion was served on all counsel who have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d) and Local Rule CV-5(e), all other counsel of record not deemed to have consented to electronic service were served with a true and correct copy of the foregoing by electronic mail by agreement of the parties on this the 1st day of June, 2006. /s/ L. David Anderson L. David Anderson

Dallas 220221v1

3