Minerva Industries, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. et al

Filing 60

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint,,,,, by HTC America, Inc.,. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Tindel, Andy)

Download PDF
Minerva Industries, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. et al Doc. 60 Case 2:07-cv-00229-TJW Document 60 Filed 10/03/2007 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MINERVA INDUSTRIES, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) 1. MOTOROLA, INC.; ) 2. NOKIA, INC.; ) 3. NOKIA MOBILE PHONES, INC.; ) 4. ALLTEL CORPORATION ) 5. ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS ) WIRELESS, INC; ) 6. ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; ) 7. ALLTEL COMMUNICATIONS OF ) TEXARKANA, INC.; ) 8. ALLTEL WIRELESS OF ) TEXARKANA, LLC; ) 9. AT&T MOBILITY, LLC; ) 10. BOOST MOBILE; ) 11. DOBSON CELLULAR SYSTEMS, ) INC. D/B/A CELLULAR ONE; ) 12. HELIO, INC.; ) 13. HELIO, LLC; ) 14. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY ) 15. METROPCS, INC.; ) 16. METROPCS TEXAS, LLC; ) 17. METROPCS WIRELESS, INC.; ) 18. QWEST WIRELESS, LLC; ) 19. SOUTHERNLINC WIRELESS; ) 20. SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION; ) 21. SPRINT WIRELESS BROADBAND ) COMPANY, LLC; ) 22. SUNCOM WIRELESS OPERATING ) COMPANY, LLC; ) 23. T-MOBILE USA; ) 24. TRACFONE WIRELESS, INC.; ) 25. U.S. CELLULAR WIRELESS; ) 26. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, ) INC.; ) 27. VERIZON WIRELESS SERVICES, ) LLC; ) 1 Civil Action No. 2-07CV-229-TJW Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:07-cv-00229-TJW Document 60 Filed 10/03/2007 Page 2 of 4 28. VIRGIN MOBIL USA, LLC; 29. HTC CORPORATION; 30. HTC AMERICA, INC.; 31. KYOCERA WIRELESS CORPORATION; 32. KYOCERA AMERICA, INC.; 33. LG ELECTRONICS, USA, INC.; 34. LG ELECTRONICS MOBILECOMM USA, INC.; 35. PALM, INC.; 36. PANTECH WIRELESS, INC.; 37. SANYO NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION; 38. UTSTARCOM, INC.; 39. SONY ERICSSON COMMUNICATIONS (USA), INC.; 40. SAMSUNG AMERICA, INC.; 41. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.; 42. SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC; 43. SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, INC.; Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) DEFENDANT HTC AMERICA, INC.'S AGREED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT Defendant HTC America, Inc. ("HTC America") files this Agreed Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Patent Infringement (the "Complaint") as follows: HTC America has requested and Plaintiff has agreed to extend HTC America's time to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint up to and including January 7, 2008. A proposed Order granting this agreed motion is attached for the Court's convenience. 2 Case 2:07-cv-00229-TJW Document 60 Filed 10/03/2007 Page 3 of 4 Dated: October 3, 2007 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Andy Tindel Andy Tindel State Bar No. 20054500 PROVOST UMPHREY LAW FIRM, L.L.P. 112 East Line Street, Suite 304 Tyler, TX 75702 (903) 596-0900 Telephone (903) 596-0909 Facsimile email: atindel@andytindel.com Warren S. Heit (Lead Attorney) (pro hac vice application to be filed) CA State Bar No. 164658 WHITE & CASE LLP 3000 El Camino Real Bldg. 5, 9th Floor Palo Alto, California 94306 650-213-0300 Telephone 650-213-8158 Facsimile email: wheit@whitecase.com ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT HTC AMERICA, INC. AGREED: /s/ Larry C. Russ by Andy Tindel w/ permission Larry C. Russ CA State Bar No. 82760 Marc A. Fenster CA State Bar No. 181067 RUSS, AUGUST & KABAT 12424 Wilshire Blvd., 12th Floor Los Angeles, California 90025 (310) 826-7474 Telephone email: lruss@raklaw.com email: mfenster@raklaw.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF MINERVA INDUSTRIES, INC. 3 Case 2:07-cv-00229-TJW Document 60 Filed 10/03/2007 Page 4 of 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3) this 3rd day of October, 2007. Any other counsel of record will be served by facsimile transmission and/or first class mail. /s/ Andy Tindel Andy Tindel 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?