Wolf v. Brightroom, Inc. et al

Filing 12

Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, Move, or Otherwise Respond by SmugMug, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(DeVasto, Diane)

Download PDF
Wolf v. Brightroom, Inc. et al Doc. 12 Att. 1 Case 2:07-cv-00238-DF Document 12 Filed 08/22/2007 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:07cv238[DF] v. § BRIGHTROOM, INC.; ISLAND § PHOTOGRAPHY, INC.; ELIZABETH § DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL M. KREUTZ; BIRD'S EYE VIEW, INC.; § DIGILABS, INC.; PRINTROOM, INC.; § SMUGMUG, INC.; AND HOUR § PHOTOS, INC., d/b/a MASTER PHOTOS U.S.A. § ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT SMUGMUG, INC.'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO ANSWER, MOVE, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT Defendant SmugMug, Inc., without waiving any defenses or any matters that might be presented pursuant to FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b) or any other rule or law, filed its unopposed motion to extend its time to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint up to and including September 27, 2007. Such motion is GRANTED. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant SmugMug, Inc. has up to and including September 27, 2007 to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. PETER H. WOLF {A53\7808\0001\W0334471.1 } Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?