Function Media, L.L.C. v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 245

RESPONSE to Motion re 206 MOTION in Limine No. One: Motion to Preclude Evidence and Argument Relating to The Parties' Conduct During Discovery filed by Function Media, L.L.C.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Grinstein, Joseph)

Function Media, L.L.C. v. Google, Inc. et al

Doc. 245 Att. 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
FI-JNCTION MEDIA. L.L.C.
$ $

Plaintiff,
VS,

$
$ $

Civil Action No. 2007-CV-279

GOOGLE INC. AND YAHOO!,
Defendants.

INC.

$
$ $

$

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

IPROPOSED] ORDER DENYING IN PART GOOGLE'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 1
Before the Court is Google's Motion in Limine No.

1. After considering

said Motion,

and the opposition and replies thereto, the Court finds that the Motion should be and hereby is

DENIED IN PART. Google's motion is DENIED to the extent it seeks (1) to circumvent
Function Media's Motions in I-imine No. 17 and 47 (Dkt. No. 188) to preclude Google from
using documents, testimony, witnesses, and other evidence that Google did not timely disclose or

produce during discovery; or (2) an order preventing Function Media from arguing that Google
has not come forward with a document or other evidence to prove a particular

point. Google's

motion is OTHER\ilISE GRANTED.

Dockets.Justia.com