Function Media, L.L.C. v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 296

REPLY to Response to Motion re 197 MOTION in Limine No. Nine: Motion to Preclude Argument that Google Hindered Function Media or its Expert from Testing or Analyzing the Accused Products filed by Google, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Revised [Proposed] Order)(DeFranco, Edward)

Function Media, L.L.C. v. Google, Inc. et al

Doc. 296 Att. 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION FUNCTION MEDIA, L.L.C., v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED GOOGLE, INC. AND YAHOO!, INC. Civil Case No. 2:07-CV-279 (CE)

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT GOOGLE'S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. NINE: MOTION TO PRECLUDE ARGUMENT THAT IT HINDERED FUNCTION MEDIA FROM TESTING THE ACCUSED PRODUCT Before the Court is Defendant Google's Motion in Limine No. Nine: Motion to Preclude Argument That It Hindered Function Media from Testing the Accused Product. After considering the Motion, the relief requested therein, and the relevant facts, evidence and arguments of the parties, the Court finds that for good cause appearing the motion should be and hereby is GRANTED. Additionally, to obviate any necessity for argument that the parties' agreement to limit testing hindered either party from testing the accused product, the Court further orders that neither party shall offer criticism of the other party's testing of the accused products. IT IS SO ORDERED.

01980.51542/3218517.1

Dockets.Justia.com