Polaris IP, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 133

Consent MOTION for Protective Order by Polaris IP, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Edmonds, John)

Download PDF
Polaris IP, LLC v. Google Inc. et al Doc. 133 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION BRIGHT RESPONSE, LLC v. GOOGLE INC., et al. 2:07-CV-371-CE JURY UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER Plaintiff, Bright Response, LLC moves for entry of the Agreed Protective Order submitted herewith. This Motion is unopposed. Respectfully submitted, By:_/s/ John J. Edmonds__________ Andrew W. Spangler ­ LEAD COUNSEL State Bar No. 24041960 Spangler Law P.C. 208 N. Green Street, Suite 300 Longview, Texas 75601 (903) 753-9300 (903) 553-0403 (fax) spangler@spanglerlawpc.com David M. Pridham R.I. Bar No. 6625 Law Office of David Pridham 25 Linden Road Barrington, Rhode Island 02806 (401) 633-7247 (401) 633-7247 david@pridhamiplaw.com Daniel F. Perez Texas Bar No. 15776380 THE PEREZ LAW FIRM 6131 Park Lane Dallas, Texas 75225 (214) 289-6659 (214) 521-1128 (fax) dan@pereziplaw.com Dockets.Justia.com John J. Edmonds Texas Bar No. 00789758 The Edmonds Law Firm, PC 709 Sabine Street Houston, Texas 77007 (713) 858-3320 (832) 415-2535 (fax) johnedmonds@edmondslegal.com COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF BRIGHT RESPONSE LLC, F/K/A POLARIS IP, LLC CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE Counsel for Plaintiff and Defendants have conferred by telephone and e-mail and this motion is unopposed. July 25, 2008 _/s/ John J. Edmonds__________ John J. Edmonds CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service are being served today with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). Any other counsel of record will be served by electronic mail, facsimile transmission and/or first class mail on this same date. July 25, 2008 _/s/ John J. Edmonds__________ John J. Edmonds 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?