Polaris IP, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 240

Unopposed MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney Michael E. Jones, John F. Bufe, Allen F. Gardner and the Potter Minton, P.C. law firm as counsel by Yahoo!, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Jones, Michael)

Download PDF
Polaris IP, LLC v. Google Inc. et al Doc. 240 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION BRIGHT RESPONSE LLC v. GOOGLE, INC., ET AL Civil Action No. 2:07-cv-371 [CE] Jury Trial Demanded DEFENDANT YAHOO! INC.'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL Defendant Yahoo! Inc. files this Unopposed Motion to Withdraw as Counsel and respectfully requests that Michael E. Jones, John F. Bufe, Allen F. Gardner and the POTTER MINTON, P.C. law firm be permitted to withdraw herein as counsel of record for Yahoo! Inc. in the above-captioned matter. Yahoo! Inc. consents to this request and said Defendant is currently represented by other counsel in this matter. No other changes are requested at this time regarding the other attorneys acting as said defendant's counsel of record. Plaintiff does not oppose this motion. Dated: November 23, 2009 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Michael E. Jones MICHAEL E. JONES State Bar No. 10929400 Allen F. Gardner State Bar No. 24043679 John F. Bufe State Bar No. 03316930 POTTER MINTON A Professional Corporation 110 N. College Ave., Suite 500 Tyler, Texas 75702 Phone: 903.597.8311 Facsimile: 903.593.0846 Dockets.Justia.com Email: mikejones@potterminton.com allengardner@potterminton.com johnbufe@potterminton.com Attorneys for Defendant Yahoo! Inc. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that all counsel of record who have consented to electronic service are being served with a copy of this document via the Court's CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV5(a)(3) on this the 23rd day of November, 2009. Any other counsel of record will be served by First Class U.S. Mail on this same date. /s/ Michael E. Jones MICHAEL E. JONES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?