Polaris IP, LLC v. Google Inc. et al
Filing
439
MOTION in Limine Number 2 (Testimony of Chuck Williams) by Bright Response LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Elizabeth Wiley, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Wiley, Elizabeth)
<![CDATA[
Polaris IP, LLC v. Google Inc. et al
Doc. 439 Att. 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION BRIGHT RESPONSE, LLC, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE, INC., et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § §
Civil Action No. 2:07-cv-371-ce JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
ORDER On this day the Court considered Motion in Limine No. 2 of Plaintiff Bright Response, LLC ("Bright Response"). Bright Response requests an order excluding testimony from Mr. Chuck Williams in which Mr. Williams purports to offer information concerning a date on which the EZ Reader application was functioning or being used or operated in some iteration. Based on the testimony provided, the Court finds that Mr. Williams's testimony is inadmissible as he is not a competent witness on this topic; he lacks personal knowledge and no foundation exists for the document. For any one and/or all of these reasons, Mr. Williams's testimony on this issue concerning the EZ Reader is inadmissible for any purpose.
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
