Polaris IP, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 460

MOTION in Limine Number 1 (Uncharted Prior Art References): Motion to Preclude Defendants' Reliance on or Reference to Uncharted Prior Art References (EZ Reader Manual and CBR Express Manuals) and Hearsay by Bright Response LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Wiley Declaration, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E PART I, # 7 Exhibit E PART II, # 8 Exhibit E PART III, # 9 Exhibit F, # 10 Exhibit G, # 11 Exhibit H, # 12 Exhibit I, # 13 Exhibit J, # 14 Exhibit K, # 15 Text of Proposed Order)(Spangler, Andrew)

Polaris IP, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Doc. 460 Att. 15

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION BRIGHT RESPONSE, LLC, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE, INC., et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § §

Civil Action No. 2:07-cv-371-ce JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER On this day the Court considered Motion in Limine No. 1 of Plaintiff Bright Response, LLC ("Bright Response"). Bright Response requests an order excluding numerous items that have been inadequate disclosed, such as not charted and therefore cannot support the expert opinion of Defendants' expert Dr. Branting. Specifically, Plaintiff requests the Court to preclude any reliance or reference to as prior art references the CBR Express references manuals for an anticipation theory, as well as the EZ Reader manual, a distinct publication from the EZ Reader article that has been the subject of Defendants' invalidity contentions. The Court finds that the Motion should be and is hereby GRANTED in its entirety.

Dockets.Justia.com