Polaris IP, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 575

MOTION for Reconsideration OR TO CLARIFY THE COURTS RULING DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 14 (CLAIMS NO LONGER BEING PURSUED) IN LIGHT OF THE COURTS GRANTING MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 15 (PRODUCTS NO LONGER ACCUSED) by Bright Response LLC. (Attachments: # 1 DECLARATION, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Wiley, Elizabeth)

Download PDF
Polaris IP, LLC v. Google Inc. et al Doc. 575 Att. 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION BRIGHT RESPONSE, LLC, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE, INC., et al., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 2:07-cv-371-ce JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ORDER Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Clarify Or Reconsider The Court's ruling Denying Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 14 (Claims No Longer Being Asserted) In Light Of The Court's Granting Motion In Limine No. 15 (Products No Longer Being Accused). The Court finds that the Motion has merit and should be GRANTED. The Court therefore orders, commensurate with its ruling on Plaintiff's Motion in Limine No. 15, as follows: That the portion of Plaintiff's Motion in Limine requesting that the Court preclude Defendants from referring to the fact that Plaintiff is no longer pursuing certain claims that it had previously asserted is GRANTED: Defendants are precluded from stating that a particular claim was at one time asserted and is now not asserted, but this Order does not prevent the Defendants from saying in front of the jury that particular claims of the `947 patent are not and have not been asserted. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?