Polaris IP, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 664

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Motion to Redact Trial Transcript by Google Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Perlson, David)

Download PDF
Polaris IP, LLC v. Google Inc. et al Doc. 664 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION BRIGHT RESPONSE, LLC, Plaintiff vs. GOOGLE INC., et al, Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § NO. 2:07-CV-371-CE JURY GOOGLE'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION TO REDACT TRIAL TRANSCRIPT The deadline to request redactions of the trial transcript in this case is currently September 23, 2010. (Dkt. 636-650.) Defendant Google respectfully moves this Court for an order granting a one-week extension of time to September 30, 2010 file a motion to redact the trial transcript. Plaintiff does not oppose this extension. Dated: September 23, 2010 By: /s/ David Perlson Charles K. Verhoeven, CA Bar No. 170151 LEAD ATTORNEY David A. Perlson, CA Bar No. 209502 Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com davidperslon@quinnemanuel.com Jennifer Parker Ainsworth TX Bar No. 00784720 Wilson, Robertson & Cornelius, P.C. P.O. Box 7339 01980.51452/3694308.1 Dockets.Justia.com Tyler, Texas 75711 Telephone: (903) 509-5000 Facsimile: (903) 509-5092 jainsworth@wilsonlawfirm.com ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS Google, Inc., AOL LLC and America Online Inc. 01980.51452/3694308.1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that all counsel of record are being served via electronic mail with a copy of this document on September 23, 2010. /s/ Eugene Novikov Eugene Novikov CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE The undersigned counsel for Google Inc. discussed this Motion with counsel for Plaintiff via email on September 23, 2010, and Plaintiff does not oppose this Motion. /s/ Eugene Novikov Eugene Novikov 01980.51452/3694308.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?