PA Advisors, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 275

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge David Folsom: Markman Hearing held on 9/17/2009. (Court Reporter Libby Crawford.) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Cts Preliminary Claim Construction) (mrm, )

Download PDF
PA Advisors, LLC v. Google Inc. et al Doc. 275 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS M A RSHA LL DIVISION Judge David Folsom PA ADVISOR )( )( )( )( V. )( CIVIL NO. 2:07CV480 )( GOOGLE INC. )( ________________________________________________________________________ ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS: Andrew Spangler; David Pridham; Marc Fenster; Patrick Anderson; John Bustamante; Ari Rafilson; Brian Cannon; David Beck; Charles Verhoeven; John Bufe; Jason White David Keyzer and John Lahad Mel Martin ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS: LAW CLERK: COURTROOM DEPUTY: COURT REPORTER: Libby Crawford _________________________________________________________________________ CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING September 17, 2009 @ 9:00 a.m. OPEN: 8:58 ADJOURN: 11:36 _________________________________________________________________________ 8:58 ct opens; ct/ preliminary claim construction on 6 of the 10 terms; 8:59 9:19 9:19 9:20 9:20 recess; ct resumes; Fesnter/ agreement both sides on 1, 3, and 6; plf does agree to 2 and 4 as well; ct/ what about 5 any room for agreement Verhoeven/ agree with all except 2 and 4; 9:21 ct/ that should save us some additional time; prefer claim term or related term; response and then reply; is that how ptys anticipate going forward; Fenster/ yes ct/ don't need a lot of time on general claim construction principals; Fenster/ 2 mins background of patent and inventor; ct/ makes preliminary claim construction a part of the record as cts exh 1; 9:30 "linguistic pattern" first term; Verhoeven/ response; 9:22 9:22 9:22 9:25 9:40 10:04 ct/ did you touch on term repeating 10:04 Verhoeven/ yes; 10:05 Fenster/ reply; first with respect to repeating; 10:13 Fenster/ next term is "segment" we agreed to cts preliminary construction; 10:14 Verhoeven/ responds; 10:17 Fenster/ reply; 10:21 Verhoeven/ reply; 10:27 Fenster/ sur-reply; 10:28 three profile terms; "search request profile" ; proposed compromise 10:30 Verhoeven/ responds; 10:30 ct/ so we still have a disagreement; 10:31 Fenster/ difference between collection and file; 10:33 Verhoeven/ response; 10:34 Fenster/ next term "user profile and user data profile" 10:35 Verhoeven/ leaves out important aspect of proposed construction; 10:36 ct/ you think we need language about frequency; 10:36 Fenster/ claims don't require it; 10:47 Verhoeven/ response; 10:49 ct/ suggested compromise 10:50 Verhoeven/ responds; 10:59 Fenster/ reply; 11:03 recess 11:18 Fenster/ "data item profile" 11:21 Verhoeven/ response; 11:23 Fenster/ "psychological profile" on cts preliminary construction which plfs agree; 11:24 ct/ let's hear from dfts 11:24 Verhoeven/ psychological profile; 11:26 ct/ can plf live with initial construction; 11:26 Fenster/ initial construction was offered before I joined the team; 11:28 Verhoeven/ reply; 11:29 ct/ new compromise 11:29 Fenster/ responds; last term "text item" 11:32 Canon/ responds; 11:33 Fenster/ reply; 11:35 Canon/ sur-reply; 11:35 ct/ what else 11:35 Fenster/ that is it; 11:35 ct/ will try to have order out in advance of me leaving for Marshall docket; is this case set for March 2010; 11:36 Fenster/ yes; 11:36 adjourned

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?