PA Advisors, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 277

SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response to Motion re #257 MOTION to Quash and MOTION for Protective Order to Preclude Deposition of Johanna Shelton filed by PA Advisors, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Sur-Reply ISO Oppn to Mot to Quash re Shelton)(Bustamante, John)

Download PDF
PA Advisors, LLC v. Google Inc. et al 03-40860 Summary Doc. 277 Att. 1 9/25/09 7:32 AM Court Home Case Search Calendar Opinions Orders/Judgments Billing History XML TXT Logout Help If you view the Full Docket you will be charged for 2 Pages $0.16 General Docket United States Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket #: 03-40860 In Re: TX Auto Deal, et al Appeal From: Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Case Type Information: 1) Original Proceedings 2) Mandamus 3) Originating Court Information: District: 0540-5 : 5:97-CV-273 Responding Judge: Richard A. Schell, U.S. District Judge Date Filed: Docketed: 06/23/2003 Termed: 07/25/2003 https://ecf.ca5.uscourts.gov/cmecf/servlet/TransportRoom?servlet=CaseSummary.jsp&caseNum=03-40860&incOrigDkt=Y&incDktEntries=Y Page 1 of 2 Dockets.Justia.com 03-40860 Summary 9/25/09 7:32 AM 07/09/2003 07/09/2003 07/09/2003 07/10/2003 Appearance form filed by William Scott Hastings for Petitioner Gene Fondren, Petitioner TX Auto Dealers Assn. [03-40860] (SDH) Appearance form filed by Robert T Mowrey for Petitioner Gene Fondren, Petitioner TX Auto Dealers Assn. [03-40860] (SDH) Appearance form filed by Thomas George Yoxall for Petitioner Gene Fondren, Petitioner TX Auto Dealers Assn. [03-40860] (SDH) Response/opposition filed by Respondent Bert A Robinson, Respondent Mary Luman, Respondent Toyia Urbaniak, Respondent Kirk T Garner to petition for writ of mandamus [4228780 - 1] by Petitioner TX Auto Dealers Assn, Gene Fondren Response/Opposition ddl satisfied. Date of COS: 7/9/03 Sufficient [Y/N]: Y. [4246020-1] [03-40860] (PAC) Unopposed motion filed by Petitioner TX Auto Dealers Assn, Petitioner Gene Fondren [4250121 - 1] for leave to file reply to response/opposition [4246020-1] by Respondent Bert A Robinson, Mary Luman, Toyia Urbaniak, Kirk T Garner Date of COS: 7/14/03 Sufficient [Y/N]: Y [03-40860] (PAC) Appearance form filed by Robert L Templeton for Respondent Kirk T Garner, Respondent Toyia Urbaniak, Respondent Mary Luman, Respondent Bert A Robinson. [03 - 40860] (DMS) Appearance form filed by John True Smithee for Respondent Kirk T Garner, Respondent Toyia Urbaniak, Respondent Mary Luman, Respondent Bert A Robinson. [03-40860] (D M S ) Appearance form filed by Joe W Hayes for Respondent Kirk T Garner, Respondent Toyia Urbaniak, Respondent Mary Luman, Respondent Bert A Robinson. [03-40860] (DMS) COURT Order filed granting petition for writ of mandamus. The district court's March 27, 2003 order granting in part the plaintiffs' motion to compel and its June 5, 2003 order denying the defendants' motion for partial reconsideration regarding discovery are vacated to the extent those orders require the petitioners to produce the attorney-client communications at issue (PRIV 0001-04, 00010-13, 00017, 00018-19, 00028-29, 00075, and 00098-128). We leave to the district court entry of any further order necessary to effectuate our ruling, including an order denying plaintiffs' motion to compel production of those communications. [4228780-1] Judge Initials: EGJ PEH Copies to all counsel. [03 - 40860] (PAC) COURT Order filed granting petitioners' unopposed motion for leave to file reply brief in support of their petition for writ of mandamus [4250121-1] (PEH) Copies to all counsel. [03 - 40860] (PAC) 07/15/2003 07/16/2003 07/16/2003 07/16/2003 07/25/2003 09/04/2003 PACER Service Center Transaction Receipt 09/25/2009 07:25:45 PACER Login: Description: Billable Pages: bu0716 Case Summary 1 Client Code: Search Criteria: Cost: nXn 03- 40860 0.08 https://ecf.ca5.uscourts.gov/cmecf/servlet/TransportRoom?servlet=CaseSummary.jsp&caseNum=03-40860&incOrigDkt=Y&incDktEntries=Y Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?