PA Advisors, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 294

Opposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to Interrogatory by Google Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E)(Cannon, Brian)

Download PDF
PA Advisors, LLC v. Google Inc. et al Doc. 294 Att. 6 EXHIBIT E Dockets.Justia.com From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Debera Hepburn [dhepburn@heplaw.com] Friday, October 30, 2009 3:13 PM Brian Cannon; David Perlson; PA Advisors v. Google; mrichardson@brsfirm.com; Andrea P Roberts 'David Pridham'; 'John Bustamante'; 'Andrew Weiss'; 'A Spangler'; 'Marc Fenster'; 'White, Jason' RE: nXn Tech v. Google, Inc., et al. Brian, We can add your items to Monday's meet and confer agenda. Bright Response is amenable to a 2 week extension for the Google interrogatory responses. Because of the upcoming discovery deadlines, nXn cannot agree to an extension of the current interrogatory due date. Best 2Zegards, De6era 'W Mep6urn Agp6urn @ ( eplaw. com r T'el (214) 403-4882 'Fax; (888) 205-8791 .PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL * ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION * ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT From : Brian Cannon [mailto:briancannon@quinnemanuel.com] Sent : Friday, October 30, 2009 ?2:49 PM To: dhepburn@heplaw.com; David Perlson; PA Advisors v. Google; mrichardson@brsfirm.com; Andrea P Roberts Cc: 'David Pridham; 'John Bustamante'; 'Andrew Weiss'; 'A Spangler'; 'Marc Fenster'; White, Jason Subject . RE: nXn Tech v. Google, Inc., et al. Debera: Since there is a meet and confer conference call already set up for Monday at 11 AM central time, we can discuss the discovery issues raised in your letter and my Oct 26 letter at that time. Also, I am generally available today (except 2-3 central) if you want to call me without setting up a formal time for all counsel to be present. In addition, can you or someone on your team respond to my request for an extension of time for Google' s interrogatory responses that are due on Monday , November 2? We requested one week for the PA Advisors/ nXn answers and two weeks for the Bright Response answers . Thank you. Brian Cannon Partner, .Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges LLP. 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 Redwood Shores, CA 91065 650-801-5055 Direct 650.801.5000 Main Office Number 650.801.5100 FAX briancannon@guinnemanuel.com www.auinnemanuel.com^ NC31ICEw he inforrnatioa contained inĚthis e rn 3il rressage is intended only for the personal anti confidential use of the reciplent(s) named abovc, 10s me<,,sasle may be an attorney-dient conyLi i cat!on aril/or work product and as such is privdeged and confidential. If the reader of this rnessagr is r1eit the it i xndertl recipient or agent res onsible for CeWering it to the ir1fend0d reciplQnt, YOU are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, eistrihution, or copying of this nessage is strictly probbited. If you have received this cornnureiCation i1 error, please notify us inim.ediately by e-marl, aid delete the original nwss:age. From : Debera Hepburn [maiito:dhepburn@heplaw.com] Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 4:48 PM To: Brian Cannon; David Perlson; PA Advisors v. Google; mrichardson@brsfirm.com; Andrea P Roberts Cc: 'David Pridham; 'John Bustamante'; 'Andrew Weiss; 'A Spangler; 'Marc Fenster' Subject : nXn Tech v. Google, Inc., et al. Counsel, Please find the attached correspondence. Best Regards, De6era ░W. Zep6urn -Vep6urn Law'F'irm TLLC T.O. Bo.,118218 Carroflton, TeXas 7501.1 Tek (214) 403-4882 TxC: (888 205-8791 g&p6urn p hep1aw.com PRIVILEGED AND COtr'FIDENTIAL * ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION * ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT This e-mail is sent by a law firm .and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. if you are not the intended recipient, please delete the email and any attachments and notify us immediately. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?