PA Advisors, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 436

MOTION for Additional Trial Days by Google Inc., Yahoo! Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Eugene Novikov, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Affidavit of Jason White, #7 Exhibit 1)(Perlson, David) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/24/2010: #8 Text of Proposed Order) (sm, ).

PA Advisors, LLC v. Google Inc. et al

Doc. 436 Att. 2

EXHIBIT A

Dockets.Justia.com

Pre-Trial Conference Hearing

1 2 3

IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, MARSHALL DIVISION

4

_PA ADVISORS,

Plaintiff,

Civil Docket No.

6

VS.

2 : 07--cv--00480-RRR

7

GOOGLE, INC., et al.,

Defendant.

9
10
11

--------------------------.
Washington, D.C.
Monday, December 28, 2009

12

The above-entitled matter came on for Pretrial

13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

conference, pursuant to Notice.
BEFORE: HONORABLE RANDALL R. RADER, Judge

PA Advisors v. Google

Page 1

Pre-Trial Conference Hearing 1 That that seems okay. I didn't quite catch all the

2 3 4

dates that were set there. JUDGE RADER: All the -- everything on the 19th,

Daubert motions, completion of expert discovery, objections to other parties' experts, all on the 19th.
MR. CANNON: JUDGE RARER: MR. WHITE: I think that's okay. Mr. White? No objections from Yahoo, Your

JUDGE RARER:

Okay.

Good.

We've set our

11 12 13 14
15

deadlines.

Trial.

How long do you need to present your

case, Mr. Fenster? MR. FENSTER: four days.
JUDGE RARER: Mr. Cannon?

Your Honor, we anticipate three to

16 17 question.

MR. CANNON:

Mr. Verhoeven can answer this

18
19

MR. VERHOEVEN :

I think we'd request five days,

Your Honor. JUDGE RARER: time , gentlemen . Okay. I don't have that much several

20
21

Now I 'll give you -- I've got

22

cases I'm doing in April, as you may know, and I will be
Page 65

PA Advisors v. Google

Pre-Trial Conference Hearing

1
2 3

willing --- let's do this for starters .

I'll give you

four days for this trial and -- but let me tell you, I don't take long picking a jury.
The way I see this happening is we'll be in the court about 7 o'clock in the morning on April 12th. At 9 o'clock we'll have our jury candidates in the courtroom.

4

7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16

We'll have a jury selected somewhere around 11, and your closing arguments will be done -- your opening statements will be done before we have lunch. So that's -- the Court moves expeditiously. I'd like you to shoot for, as I said, four days equally divided. The pretrial conference date will be March 1st. That's the date that was scheduled anyway. Motions in
limine, let's have them come in on the same date as our - everything closes on the 19th, with a response to those motions on the 24th, and then we'll have our pretrial

17
18 19

conference.
If you gentlemen are satisfied, we can do the pretrial conference the way we're doing this, so over the

20
21 22

Internet.

Will that suit you, Mr. Fenster?
MR. FENSTER: JUDGE RADER: I believe so, Your Honor. The alternative is if you are

PA Advisors v. Goggle

Page 66