Northeastern University et al v. Google, Inc.,
MOTION to Compel 30(b)(6) DEPOSITION TESTIMONY FROM JARG CORPORATION AND NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY by Google, Inc.,. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Boston Globe article, # 2 Exhibit B - Reuters article, # 3 Exhibit C - Amended Notice of Deposition to Jarg, # 4 Exhibit D - Amended Notice of Deposition to NU, # 5 Exhibit E - Jarg Objs to Google 30b6 Not, # 6 Exhibit F - NU Objs to Google 30b6 Not, # 7 Exhibit G - NU and Jarg Initial Disclosures, # 8 Exhibit H - Order Denying MyMail Mot for PO and Granting AOL Mot to Compel, # 9 Exhibit I - Amended Docket Control Order, # 10 Exhibit J - Jarg Notice of Disclosures, # 11 Exhibit K - D195 Order Re Mass Eng v Ergotron, # 12 Exhibit L - Pirri Depo Transcript, # 13 Exhibit M - Belanger Depo Transcript, # 14 Text of Proposed Order Order Granting Motion to Compel)(Wolff, Jason)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY and JARG CORPORATION Plaintiffs, v. GOOGLE INC. Defendant. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL 30(b)(6) DEPOSITION TESTIMONY FROM JARG CORPORATION AND NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY Before the Court is Defendant Google Inc.'s ("Defendant") Motion to Compel 30(b)(6) Deposition Testimony From Jarg Corporation and Northeastern University, filed on November 26, 2008. After considering the Motion, the Court finds that the Motion should be GRANTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Jarg Corporation and Northeastern University shall each designate knowledgeable witnesses on the three topics previously noticed in Defendant's September 17, 2008 Amended 30(b)(6) Deposition Notices. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiffs Jarg Corporation and Northeastern University pay Defendant's fees and costs for the September 23, 2008 and September 25, 2008 30(b)(6) depositions of Jarg Corporation and Northeastern University. Civil Action No. 2:07-CV-486-CE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?