Northeastern University et al v. Google, Inc.,

Filing 97

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham: Markman Hearing held on 10/6/2010. (Court Reporter Shelly Holmes, CSR.) (Attachments: # 1 Attorney Sign-In Sheet) (jml)

Download PDF
Northeastern University et al v. Google, Inc., Doc. 97 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY, ET AL VS. GOOGLE, INC. 2:07-CV-486 (CE) OPEN: 9:06 a.m. Markman Hearing Minutes October 6, 2010 ADJOURN: 12:19 p.m. See attached. See attached. Eric Hansen Jan Lockhart Shelly Holmes, CSR ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS: ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT: LAW CLERK: COURTROOM DEPUTY: COURT REPORTER: 9:06 a.m. Court opened. The attorneys announced ready. 9:07 a.m. Mr. Weaver presented claim construction argument on behalf of Plaintiffs. The Court responded. 9:42 a.m. Mr. Ryan presented additional claim construction argument on behalf of Plaintiffs. The Court responded. 10:01 a.m. Mr. Stout presented additional claim construction argument on behalf of Plaintiffs. The Court responded. 10:14 a.m. Mr. Wolff presented additional claim construction argument on behalf of Defendant. The Court responded. 10:29 a.m. Mr. Cordell presented additional claim construction argument on behalf of Defendant. The Court responded. 10:51 a.m. Morning break. 11:10 a.m. Court reconvened. Dockets.Justia.com Page Two Minutes October 6, 2010 11:11 a.m. Mr. Cordell continued claim construction argument on behalf of Defendant. The Court responded. 11:38 a.m. Mr. Yen presented additional claim construction argument on behalf of Defendant. The Court's responded. 11:54 a.m. Mr. Cordell conducted additional claim construction argument on behalf of Defendant. The Court responded. 12:00 p.m. Mr. Ryan presented additional claim construction argument on behalf of Plaintiffs. The Court responded. 12:19 p.m. Court adjourned.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?