IP Innovation LLC et al v. Google, Inc.

Filing 32

NOTICE by Google, Inc. of Filing of Proposed Discovery Order and Proposed Docket Control Order (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Discovery Order, # 2 Exhibit Proposed Docket Control Order)(Rogers, Elizabeth)

IP Innovation LLC et al v. Google, Inc.

Doc. 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION § § § § § § § § § § § §

IP INNOVATION L.L.C. AND TECHNOLOGY LICENSING CORPORATION, Plaint iffs, v. GOOGLE INC., Defendant.

CASE NO. 2:07CV-503-LED JURY TRIAL REQUESTED

NOTICE OF FILING OF PROPOSED DISCOVERY ORDER AND PROPOSED DOCKET CONTROL ORDER

Pursuant to the Court's May 15, 2008 Order, the Parties have reached an agreement on a Proposed Discovery Order (attached as Exhibit A) and Proposed Docket Control Order (attached as Exhibit B). The parties hereby submit the same for the Court's consideration.

Dated: May 30, 2008

Respect fully submitted, By: /s/ Elizabeth I. Rogers Elizabeth I. Rogers (admitted pro hac vice) WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 1117 California Avenue Palo Alto, CA 94304 [phone] [phone] (FAX) COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT AND COUNTER-CLAIM PLAINTIFF GOOGLE INC.

Dockets.Justia.com

LEAD ATTORNEY: David J. Beck Texas Bar No. 00000070 [e-mail] m BECK, REDDEN & SECREST, L.L.P. One Houston Center 1221 McKinney St., Suite 4500 Houston, Texas 77010 [phone] [phone] (Fax) OF COUNSEL: Michael E. Richardson Texas Bar No. 24002838 [e-mail] m BECK, REDDEN & SECREST, L.L.P. One Houston Center 1221 McKinney St., Suite 4500 Houston, Texas 77010 [phone] [phone] (Fax) Mark G. Matuschak (admitted pro hac vice) Richard A. Goldenberg (admitted pro hac vice) WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 60 State Street Boston, MA 02109 [phone] [phone] (Fax) John H. Hintz (admitted pro hac vice) Victor F. Souto (admitted pro hac vice) Ross E. Firsenbaum (admitted pro hac vice) WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 399 Park Avenue New York, NY 10022 [phone] [phone] (Fax)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE The undersigned hereby certifies that the foregoing document was filed electronically in compliance with Local Rule CV-5(a). As such, this motion was served on all counsel who have consented to electronic service. Local Rule CV-5(a)(3)(A).

/s/ Elizabeth I. Rogers Elizabeth I. Rogers